Proposed Budget changes: what young investors should consider
"I'll be fine, but you guys - less so." That's more or less what I told some of my younger colleagues in a recent team meeting as we discussed the proposed capital gains tax changes in the budget.
The people in that room ranged from their mid-20s to mid-40s. Some were already more financially established. Others are only just starting to build wealth.
As someone responsible for the livelihoods of more than 30 people, I am acutely aware that policy changes like this do not fall evenly. They land hardest on those who have the least accumulated capital and the longest road ahead. That is why these changes worry me.
The blanket application of a 30% minimum tax on gains, combined with indexation, across a wide range of assets risks distorting investor behaviour. It makes long-term growth assets less attractive at exactly the point when younger Australians have already been shut out of the old wealth-building playbook.
For older generations, we've been able to ride the capital growth wave on our properties and pay tax on favourable terms. Much of that wealth has already been made and is protected.
Younger Australians have been told to adapt. If housing is out of reach, invest in shares. Build wealth through exchange-traded funds. Start a business. Take some sensible risks early and let compounding do the work.
Now they are being told the tax settings on those risk-taking decisions are changing, too.
That is the part that should trouble us most. If you close off the old path to wealth, then make the alternative paths less attractive as well, you are not levelling the playing field. You are pulling up the ladder.
Plenty has already been said about why the proposed changes won't help the people they're supposedly intended to help. My greater concern is what they do to behaviour over time.
Fewer people backing themselves. Fewer people putting money into higher-growth assets and deciding it is safer to stay in cash, chase yield or - if they have the ambition and the option - build their future somewhere else.
So, what should investors do now?
1. Focus on after-tax outcomes
In a world where realised gains matter more, portfolio turnover matters more too. That does not mean never selling, it means avoiding unnecessary churn, being more selective about what you buy, and recognising that a lower-turnover portfolio can be more tax-efficient over time. Frequent switching feels active, but it can end up handing more of your return to the Tax Office.
2. Think harder about the role of each asset in your portfolio
Growth assets, income assets, defensive assets and cash all have a job to do. If the rules change, the answer is not to abandon growth altogether. A younger investor still needs exposure to assets capable of compounding over time. A more conservative investor still needs liquidity and stability. Tax should inform the structure, not dictate it.
3. Be tax-aware, not tax-obsessed
That means understanding when gains are being realised, considering how rebalancing is done, and thinking carefully before selling simply because a tax rule has changed.
But it also means not passing up good long-term investments purely because tax might be payable one day. Avoiding tax is not the same thing as building wealth.
4. Don't forget super
For younger Australians trying to build a first home deposit, the First Home Super Saver scheme may still be one of the few tax-effective tools left.
And for those already investing outside super, consider whether some of that money would be better directed into super instead.
For investors with a longer time horizon, super becomes even more important if capital gains outside the system are taxed more heavily.
5. Use your time advantage
Younger investors still have one enormous advantage: time. Governments can change tax settings. Markets can change direction. Opportunities can shift from property to shares to businesses and back again.
But time, diversification and disciplined investing still do the heavy lifting of long-term wealth creation for most Australians.
This article first appeared online in the Australian Financial Review.
Upcoming webinar
For those who want to dig a little deeper, Alan Kohler and Intelligent Investor founder John Addis will be hosting a live webinar at 1pm AEST on Thursday 18 June.
They'll discuss the proposed changes and what they could mean for property, shares, ETFs and long-term wealth creation.
You can register here.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The proposal would introduce a blanket 30% minimum tax on realised capital gains, combined with indexation, across a wide range of assets. The article says these changes are likely to hit younger Australians hardest — those with less accumulated capital and a longer time horizon — because they rely more on risk-taking and long-term growth assets to build wealth.
Focus on after-tax outcomes: aim to reduce unnecessary portfolio turnover, be more selective about buying and selling, keep exposure to growth assets for compounding, and consider directing some savings into superannuation. The article advises being tax-aware (not tax-obsessed) and using time, diversification and disciplined investing to keep working toward long-term wealth.
Because the proposal makes realised gains more costly, frequent switching or high portfolio turnover can trigger more taxable events and hand a larger portion of returns to the Tax Office. A lower-turnover, tax-efficient approach can help preserve after-tax returns over time.
No. The article recommends keeping exposure to growth assets that can compound over time. Tax should inform how you structure your portfolio, not dictate abandoning growth altogether. Balance growth with income, defensive assets and cash according to your goals and risk tolerance.
Super becomes more important if capital gains outside super are taxed more heavily. For first-home savers, the First Home Super Saver (FHSS) scheme may remain a tax-effective tool. The article suggests considering whether some money invested outside super would be better directed into super for long-term benefits.
Time is a key advantage: younger investors can rely on long-term compounding, stay diversified, and remain disciplined through policy and market shifts. While governments and markets change, time and consistent investing typically do the heavy lifting for long-term wealth creation.
Being tax-aware means understanding when gains are realised, planning rebalancing thoughtfully, and avoiding unnecessary selling purely because tax rules changed. Being tax-obsessed would mean passing up good long-term investments just to avoid tax. The article stresses that avoiding tax is not the same as building wealth.
The article notes an upcoming live webinar with Alan Kohler and Intelligent Investor founder John Addis at 1pm AEST on Thursday 18 June, where they'll discuss the proposed changes and what they could mean for property, shares, ETFs and long-term wealth creation. You can register via the link provided in the article.

