InvestSMART

Productivity growth weak, and worsening

Australia's productivity growth is weak and likely to worsen, the Productivity Commission has found. But it says Australia isn't alone.
By · 14 Jun 2013
By ·
14 Jun 2013
comments Comments
Australia's productivity growth is weak and likely to worsen, the Productivity Commission has found. But it says Australia isn't alone.

In the first of what it intends to be annual updates, the commission says in the four years since 2006 so-called multifactor productivity slipped by an average of 1.1 per cent a year. In the decade before, it rose by an average of 0.6 per cent per year.

France, Sweden, Ireland, Britain , the US, Canada and New Zealand also moved from positive to negative productivity growth in the same time frame (although in the case of the US from positive to zero growth), the commission says.

It says the downturn began before the financial crisis for reasons that are not clear, and it quotes the New York-based Conference Board as finding one reason it is continuing is labour hoarding, "as businesses refrain from making significant cutbacks in resources in the hope of a recovery in global demand".

Australian multifactor productivity rose 0.1 per cent in 2011-12 after sliding 1.2 per cent in 2010-11, a result still well down on the long-term growth rate of 0.8 per cent.

Labour productivity climbed by a much faster 3.4 per cent as more machinery was deployed per worker, a process called capital deepening.

The commission concedes that neither measure of productivity is particularly useful. Each excludes the "non-market" industries of health, education, public administration and security. The health and social assistance industry has become Australia's biggest employer.

Many of the outputs of the industries that are included are not measured, biasing down the published measures. The commission cites the electricity industry, which has switched from stringing wires overhead to burying them underground "in response to concerns about visual amenity and safety".

It says while the cost of putting the wires underground is counted on one side of the productivity equation, the extra benefit of burying them is not counted on the other.

The commission reports woeful productivity performance in the mining and utilities industries with declines in 2011-12 of 10.5 per cent and 5.4 per cent respectively.

One reason mining productivity is falling is a "mismatch" between inputs and outputs as money is spent developing new projects ahead of an expected payoff in production.

A longer-term reason is that resources are becoming harder to find. High commodity prices have exacerbated the process, encouraging "even more rapid development of higher-cost, less productive resource deposits".

Productivity in electricity is declining in part because of what the commission suspects to have been "greater investment in distribution capacity than was socially optimal". Productivity in the water industry is declining in part because Australians' water use has yet to return to "pre-drought levels".
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

The Productivity Commission found Australia's productivity growth is weak and likely to worsen. Multifactor productivity slipped by an average of 1.1% a year in the four years since 2006, compared with average growth of 0.6% a year in the decade before.

Multifactor productivity (MFP) measures output relative to combined labour and capital inputs. Australian MFP rose 0.1% in 2011–12 after falling 1.2% in 2010–11, which is still well below the long‑term growth rate of 0.8% per year cited by the Commission.

Labour productivity climbed 3.4% in 2011–12. The Commission attributed this to capital deepening — more machinery and equipment being deployed per worker.

The Commission reported particularly weak productivity in mining and utilities in 2011–12, with declines of 10.5% and 5.4% respectively. Electricity and water sectors also showed falling productivity for related reasons.

The report cited a 'mismatch' between inputs and outputs as companies spend on developing new projects before production starts. Longer‑term factors include resources becoming harder to find and high commodity prices encouraging development of higher‑cost, less productive deposits.

The Commission notes measurement issues: both MFP and labour productivity exclude non‑market industries like health, education and public administration. Some outputs in included industries aren’t fully measured — for example, the extra benefits of burying power lines (visual amenity and safety) may not be counted even though the costs are.

No. The Commission says other advanced economies — including France, Sweden, Ireland, Britain, the US, Canada and New Zealand — also moved from positive to negative productivity growth in the same timeframe (the US moved to zero growth).

The downturn began before the global financial crisis for unclear reasons. The New York‑based Conference Board is quoted as pointing to labour hoarding — businesses holding onto staff in the hope of a demand recovery — as one factor that may be continuing to weigh on productivity.