Pressure builds on ASX to reverse hoax trades
The comments from Tony de Govrik, who spent eight years at the Australian Securities Exchange until 1993, came as investigations continue into the hoax press release that rocked Whitehaven Coal shares on Monday.
Mr de Govrik, now legal affairs director for the Australian Corporate Lawyers Association, said his former employer should soften its refusal to reverse the trades made during Monday's period of confusion.
"In fairness to the people who were trading on something that was clearly an orchestrated hoax and who have been disadvantaged, the ASX ought to consider reversing those trades," he said. "You've got to ask the question - when it's now clear that people traded on an uninformed market - why the ASX wouldn't assist the people who have been disadvantaged by reversing the trades."
Whitehaven shares fell nearly 9 per cent around midday on Monday after environmental activist Jonathan Moylan fooled some traders and media into thinking the company had been stripped of a $1.2 billion loan promised by ANZ Bank.
The ASX has stood firm behind its "trade cancellation rules", which say that a stock price must move by 10 per cent or more within three minutes to warrant a cancellation of trades made under illegitimate circumstances.
An ASX spokeswoman confirmed that the Whitehaven incident did not meet the criteria.
She said Monday's trading in Whitehaven was "within ASX's prescribed no-cancellation range. Subsequently, ASX has received no requests for cancellation from ASX market participants."
Despite a lack of formal requests, market participants have privately expressed a firm belief that trades made during the Whitehaven hoax should be cancelled.
A Melbourne stockbroker said: "Here we have an open-and-shut case of a hoax that has adversely impacted a significant listed company . . . if there was ever a case of an ill-informed market in operation, then this is it. If we're not going to even consider reversing trades after the Whitehaven hoax, then when are we?"
Mr de Govrik said the market operator needed to be more flexible and deal with matters on their merit.
"ASX should be able to exercise some discretion under its rather rigid operating rules to cancel trades in extreme circumstances such as these," he said.
"If I was a seller I would be a bit concerned, especially if I sold near the bottom of the market on the day," added.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
A hoax press release falsely claimed Whitehaven Coal had lost a $1.2 billion loan promised by ANZ, which fooled some traders and media. The fake news knocked Whitehaven shares down nearly 9% around midday on Monday, contributing to what the article describes as part of a $314 million market manipulation, and left some traders facing losses.
The article names environmental activist Jonathan Moylan as having fooled some traders and media with the hoax press release, which triggered the sharp move in Whitehaven Coal's share price.
The ASX's cancellation rules require a stock price to move by 10% or more within three minutes to consider cancelling trades made under illegitimate circumstances. An ASX spokeswoman said Monday's Whitehaven trading did not meet that threshold and was 'within ASX's prescribed no‑cancellation range,' and the ASX received no formal requests for cancellation from market participants.
According to the article, the ASX has received no formal requests for cancellation, though some market participants have privately expressed a strong belief that trades made during the Whitehaven hoax should be cancelled.
Tony de Govrik, a former ASX manager of legal services and now legal affairs director for the Australian Corporate Lawyers Association, argued traders who lost money trading on the hoax should have their money returned and that the ASX ought to consider reversing those trades. He said the ASX should be more flexible and exercise discretion under its rules in extreme circumstances.
The article refers to the incident as part of a $314 million market manipulation and notes Whitehaven shares fell nearly 9% around midday on the day of the hoax.
A Melbourne stockbroker quoted in the article said the hoax was an 'open‑and‑shut case' of a hoax that adversely impacted a listed company and argued it represented an ill‑informed market in operation — suggesting that trades made on false information harmed sellers who may have sold near the bottom that day.
Yes — the article says investigations continue into the hoax press release that rocked Whitehaven shares. While some experts urge the ASX to consider reversing trades in such extreme cases, the ASX maintained the trading did not meet its cancellation criteria and has not received cancellation requests, so any return of funds or rule changes would depend on further developments and official actions.

