Pension looms large for a generation of working women
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The article highlights that some older women have very low super balances. It gives the example of Kerrie Eather with $39,700 after more than 40 years in the workforce, notes the average super for a woman of her age is $90,783 (versus $112,632 for men), and reports 60% of women aged 65 to 69 have no superannuation at all.
Mrs Eather had been making weekly contributions of $50. At that rate she calculated she would finish with about $60,000 in super, which she said would be insufficient and mean she would likely need to keep working in retirement rather than living comfortably on the pension.
The article explains women are worried because many have low or no superannuation—often due to time out for child care or widowhood—and therefore would be heavily dependent on the Age Pension. That reliance makes it hard to afford extras like holidays and can leave women classed as the 'working poor.'
The article says the Gillard government capped super top-ups by over-50s at $25,000 rather than the $50,000 it had originally promised. Mrs Eather is reluctant to strongly criticise the decision but is frustrated the government is not doing more to reduce reliance on the pension.
According to the article, taking time out to raise children or other caregiving roles can lead to much lower super balances. Many women who took time out—plus some widows—end up with little super and face financial pressure in later life.
Yes. Using Mrs Eather as an example, the article suggests that because her projected super is small (about $60,000 at her contribution rate), she expects to keep working during retirement because the pension alone would not allow for extras like weekend trips or holidays.
The article cites statistics from the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia showing the average superannuation of a woman of Mrs Eather's age is $90,783 while the average man has $112,632, and that 60% of women aged 65 to 69 have no superannuation.
The article uses 59‑year‑old Kerrie Eather as a personal example: after more than 40 years in the workforce she has $39,700 in super, was contributing $50 a week, was laid off after an accident, and lost her husband the prior year. Her situation illustrates how modest savings, life events and limited policy support can leave many women at risk of poverty in retirement.

