InvestSMART

Orchard investors want Macek's scalp

DISSIDENT shareholders in the embattled $1.6 billion Orchard Funds Management have demanded the resignation of chairman Charles Macek, the godfather of corporate governance and former Telstra director.
By · 14 Feb 2011
By ·
14 Feb 2011
comments Comments
DISSIDENT shareholders in the embattled $1.6 billion Orchard Funds Management have demanded the resignation of chairman Charles Macek, the godfather of corporate governance and former Telstra director.

In a strongly worded letter, investors Curt Roberts, Hans Sprangers and David Minear have also called on Orchard's deputy chairman David Spruell and acting chief executive Chris Thiris to resign from the board.

The Melbourne-based Orchard's Office Fund and Diversified Property Fund, and the management vehicle itself, are heavily indebted and have been looking for a white knight for more than a year. Orchard hit trouble in April last year when it faced a deadline to repay about $415 million to its bankers.

There are about 15,000 investors in Orchard and in the group's 2010 annual review Mr Macek acknowledged questions about "the ability of the group and its funds to operate as going concerns without the support of their financiers".

It holds about $19 million in gross bank debt and two weeks ago Mr Macek confirmed that directors had reached agreement to extend the Orchard Diversified Property Fund's loan facilities of about $378 million with NAB and BOS International until February 28.

Since July, when then chief executive David Hinde resigned, the group has fielded many rescue offers, including from the former Babcock & Brown's Robert Topfer's Taemas Capital, backed by British billionaires Simon and David Reuben, and the Cromwell Property Group, which won the support of the board last year but was later knocked back by Orchard's bankers.

The groups offered to inject up to $100 million into the company.

Mr Macek, who sits on the Wesfarmers board and is currently overseas, last week proposed to investors the latest deal with Sydney Barwon Investments, but that too has raised the ire of the disgruntled shareholders.

The shareholders said the Barwon deal diluted earnings for Orchard investors and should be rejected. Mr Roberts, Mr Sprangers and Mr Minear, all of whom have served on the boards of public companies, have grown increasingly disillusioned with the Orchard leadership in the past three years.

Collectively the three have about $2 million invested in Orchard and its funds. Mr Roberts said: "The dark-room development of the Barwon proposal was the last straw.

"We believe that the Barwon deal is a last-ditch run for the door by Macek, hastily proposed, and it is being promoted in an air of desperation.

"We decided to lodge a notice for an extraordinary general meeting to remove these directors who we believe have been derelict in their duty."

Given the anger from unitholders, shareholders and advisers, Mr Roberts said they canvassed other shareholders to gauge their reaction to the Barwon plan.

Mr Sprangers said the company's direction needed to change.

"Funds management is about investment management and stakeholder relations; Orchard have failed in both areas," he said.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Dissident investors Curt Roberts, Hans Sprangers and David Minear have sent a strongly worded letter demanding the resignation of chairman Charles Macek, deputy chairman David Spruell and acting CEO Chris Thiris. The three dissidents — who say they collectively have about $2 million invested in Orchard and its funds — have lodged a notice for an extraordinary general meeting to remove those directors.

Shareholders say the proposed deal with Sydney Barwon Investments was developed in secret, was hastily proposed and would dilute earnings for Orchard unitholders. The dissidents describe it as a "last-ditch" move and say it should be rejected.

The article describes Orchard as an embattled $1.6 billion group. Its Office Fund and Diversified Property Fund have been heavily indebted: the group faced a deadline to repay about $415 million in April of last year, the Diversified Property Fund has loan facilities of about $378 million and the article also states Orchard holds about $19 million in gross bank debt. Directors recently reached agreement to extend the Diversified Property Fund’s loan facilities with NAB and BOS International until February 28.

Since July, Orchard has fielded several rescue offers, including from Robert Topfer’s Taemas Capital (backed by British billionaires Simon and David Reuben) and from the Cromwell Property Group. Both groups offered to inject up to $100 million. Cromwell won board support last year but was later blocked by Orchard’s bankers.

In the group’s 2010 annual review, chairman Charles Macek acknowledged questions about "the ability of the group and its funds to operate as going concerns without the support of their financiers," reflecting investor and adviser concern about reliance on bank support.

The article notes there are about 15,000 investors in Orchard and its funds, so any major governance or refinancing outcomes could affect a large number of unitholders.

The dissidents say they have canvassed other shareholders to gauge reaction to the Barwon proposal, lodged a notice for an extraordinary general meeting to remove the directors they believe have been derelict in their duty, and publicly criticised management and the handling of recent rescue proposals.

Based on the article, investors should watch communications about the Barwon proposal, any notices relating to the extraordinary general meeting, updates on loan facility extensions with NAB and BOS International, banker decisions on rescue offers, and any announcements about changes to the board or executive team.