Oil rig workers paid $3 an hour
The case follows a battle by two foreign companies to keep the matter out of court by claiming neither they nor their Filipino employees are subject to Australian laws.
The Fair Work Ombudsman took action in 2011, alleging four men were underpaid a combined $127,425 over nearly two years while working on two North-West Shelf oil rigs operated by Woodside Petroleum.
It has since emerged the oil rig's manager, Maersk Drilling, was paying Perth recruiter SurveySpec $400 a day for each painter, but the workers received less than 10 per cent of that.
Justice Michael Barker dismissed applications by Hong Kong-based Pocomwell and Philippines-based Supply Oilfield Services to have the matter stayed. The director of Pocomwell and chairman of SOS is Frenchman Louis-Paul Heussaff, according to company documents.
The parties argued that an Australian court was a "clearly inappropriate forum" to hear matters about their obligations to Filipino painters working in an exclusive economic zone.
"It is inappropriate, vexatious, oppressive and an abuse of process to impose the terms of Australian industrial instruments upon foreign corporations and upon foreign seafarers subject to a different work environment, different labour conditions and a different legislative disciplinary regime," they stated.
And further, they claimed that Australia's Fair Work Act did not apply to fixed platforms and "Australian majority crewed ships", and that Pocomwell and SOS were only obliged to follow Philippine employment laws.
But Justice Barker found that Australia's Federal Court was an appropriate forum because the ombudsman wanted to apply the Fair Work Act and "there is no prospect that any alternative foreign forum would be available to determine the rights and duties of workers" under that act. And that the Fair Work Act unambiguously covers fixed platforms within the exclusive economic zone.
The matter has been listed for trial on April 8 in Western Australia.
The Fair Work Ombudsman has also taken action against SurveySpec and its sole director, Thomas Civiello.
The court heard that Maersk paid SurveySpec $400 a day for each employee. SurveySpec hired the employees from SOS for $US92 a day. And SOS hired the men from Pocomwell, which was paying them about $US30 a day. The men were paid $US900 a month for 84 hours of work a week.
The ombudsman alleges the three companies and Mr Civiello were involved in 11 breaches. Companies face maximum penalties of $33,000 per breach, while individuals face maximum penalties of $6600 per breach.
The employees worked on the Nanhai VI rig, which is owned by Chinese oil company CNOOC.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The case concerns allegations that foreign painters working on North-West Shelf oil rigs were paid less than $3 an hour when they should have been covered by Australian employment laws. The Fair Work Ombudsman launched action in 2011, alleging four men were underpaid a combined $127,425 over nearly two years while working on rigs operated by Woodside Petroleum.
The Ombudsman has taken action involving Maersk Drilling (the rig manager), Perth recruiter SurveySpec and its sole director Thomas Civiello, Hong Kong-based Pocomwell, Philippines-based Supply Oilfield Services (SOS), and the rig Nanhai VI, which is owned by Chinese oil company CNOOC. Woodside Petroleum is named as the operator of the North‑West Shelf rigs.
Court evidence reported Maersk Drilling paid SurveySpec $400 a day for each painter. SurveySpec hired employees from SOS for US$92 a day, and SOS hired the men from Pocomwell, which was paying them about US$30 a day. The article also states the men were paid US$900 a month for 84 hours of work a week and that the workers received less than 10% of the $400 daily rate Maersk paid SurveySpec.
Pocomwell and SOS argued an Australian court was a 'clearly inappropriate forum' because the workers and corporations were foreign, subject to different labour conditions, and they asserted the Fair Work Act did not apply to fixed platforms and 'Australian majority crewed ships.' They claimed they were only obliged to follow Philippine employment laws.
Justice Michael Barker dismissed the applications to stay the matter, finding the Federal Court of Australia is an appropriate forum. He ruled the Fair Work Act unambiguously covers fixed platforms within Australia's exclusive economic zone and that no alternative foreign forum was likely to determine the rights and duties under that Act. The matter was listed for trial on April 8 in Western Australia.
According to the article, companies face maximum penalties of $33,000 per breach, while individuals face maximum penalties of $6,600 per breach. The Ombudsman alleges there were 11 breaches involving the three companies and Thomas Civiello.
Yes. The article states the Fair Work Ombudsman has taken action against Perth recruiter SurveySpec and its sole director, Thomas Civiello, in addition to pursuing claims involving Pocomwell and SOS.
Investors should monitor the Federal Court trial date (listed for April 8), published outcomes and any penalties or enforcement actions, and official company statements where applicable. The article documents who is involved (Woodside Petroleum as operator, Maersk Drilling as manager, SurveySpec, Pocomwell, SOS, CNOOC as rig owner) and the Ombudsman's allegations—facts investors may want to track for regulatory, legal and reputational developments.

