InvestSMART

Not-for-profit funds push for more transparency on deals, salaries

THE $1.4 trillion superannuation industry would be forced to disclose all transactions between funds and related parties, under a plan for sweeping change from the union-linked sector.
By · 16 Nov 2012
By ·
16 Nov 2012
comments Comments
THE $1.4 trillion superannuation industry would be forced to disclose all transactions between funds and related parties, under a plan for sweeping change from the union-linked sector.

In an attempt to boost transparency, fund managers would also be forced to reveal how much they are paid to invest members' retirement savings.

Industry Funds Management, which represents not-for-profit funds, unveiled the plan as part of its proposal for tougher governance rules, released on Thursday.

Related-party transactions occur where a fund outsources a service to an entity with which it has financial links, such as a bank-owned fund purchasing services from the bank.

A 2010 paper from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority found "for-profit" retail funds tended to pay more when entering into related-party transactions than other funds.

Top fund managers - who can earn between $500,000 and several million dollars a year - would also have to publish their pay under the policy. Fund managers' pay is often a secret.

The calls for change came as APRA released final rules on investment and governance standards for the super industry - which it will supervise from next July. APRA deputy chairman Ross Jones said the regulator would take a "principles-based" approach to implementing the new regime, and would not be too prescriptive.

"APRA will work with superannuation trustees and boards of directors to monitor how they meet the new prudential requirements and uphold their responsibility to prudently manage superannuation funds in the best interests of beneficiaries," Mr Jones said.

The latest proposals from union-linked funds go further than what the regulator has outlined in its standards for the industry.

The new chairman of Industry Funds Management, former Victorian premier Steve Bracks, said the group's latest proposals would make superannuation more accountable as the industry grew rapidly.

"We are calling for uniform disclosure standards to be legislated across all parts of the super industry, including investment managers and other material service providers."

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Industry Funds Management (representing not-for-profit funds) is calling for sweeping transparency reforms, including mandatory disclosure of all transactions between funds and related parties and public reporting of how much fund managers are paid to manage members' retirement savings.

A related-party transaction happens when a super fund outsources services to an entity with which it has financial links (for example, a bank-owned fund buying services from the bank). These deals matter because they can lead to higher costs for members if not clearly disclosed and scrutinised.

Not-for-profit funds argue that publishing fund managers' pay would improve accountability. The article notes top fund managers can earn from about $500,000 to several million dollars a year, and that pay levels are often kept secret—so disclosure would show members how much is paid to invest their retirement savings.

The proposals from union-linked funds go further than APRA's recently released investment and governance standards. Industry Funds Management is pushing for legislated, uniform disclosure standards across all parts of the super industry, beyond the regulator's more principles-based approach.

APRA released final rules on investment and governance and said it will supervise the industry from next July. Deputy chairman Ross Jones said APRA will take a principles-based approach and work with trustees and boards to monitor how they meet prudential requirements and manage funds in beneficiaries' best interests.

Mandatory disclosure would make related-party deals transparent, helping members spot potential conflicts of interest or inflated costs. That transparency can pressure funds and service providers to negotiate fairer terms and help trustees act in members' best interests.

The article cites a 2010 APRA paper which found that for-profit retail funds tended to pay more when entering into related-party transactions than other types of funds—highlighting why disclosure of these deals is important for protecting members.

Industry Funds Management, whose new chairman is former Victorian premier Steve Bracks, is backing the call. They want uniform disclosure standards legislated across the whole super industry, covering investment managers and other material service providers to increase accountability as the industry grows.