If there is one message to come out of the choice of directors and senior managers to lead the proposed split of Foster's Group it is that next year will be a turbulent year for Australia's $20 billion-plus alcohol industry.
The decision to announce the new board and chief executives of Foster's beer and wine divisions - eight days before the company closes its books for the December half - is more about pepping up the rock-bottom staff morale rather than accelerating the demerger.
That the boss of the group, Ian Johnston, won't have a position in either of the proposed businesses will boost morale and give staff some clarity as to who will be leading both entities and how the board of directors will be divvied up.
But Foster's needs to speed up the demerger rather than string it out in the hope of getting a knockout bid for all or part of the group.
The chief executives of the wine and beer business, David Dearie and John Pollaers, are seen as excellent choices, but the choice of directors appointed to each of the two boards is less obvious. For instance, the only person with any alcohol industry experience is Paul Clinton, who will be a director on the beer company. While this is good for the beer business it will be a blow to the wine unit given his deep knowledge of the North American markets, where much of the business operates.
David Crawford will become chairman of the Foster's beer company with Michael Ulmer as a director, and Max Ould is slated as chairman of the wine business with Lyndsey Cattermole also on the board. These boards are crying out for directors with marketing, alcohol and finance skills.
In a memo to his executive team yesterday, Johnston said the global economy and consumer sentiment continued to be challenging. "I trust you are looking forward to a well deserved break, and wish you a safe and relaxing festive season. Enjoy whatever time you have away, and I look forward to seeing you return in 2011 refreshed and ready for an exciting year ahead."
He is right. In the wine sector alone, more than half of the industry is potentially for sale as speculation mounts that Constellation Brands is on the brink of selling its Australian wine business, which includes Hardy and Banrock Station, and Foster's wine business will be either hived off into a separate listed entity or sold to the highest bidder.
This is against a backdrop of unprecedented levels of parallel importing in the beer, spirits and champagne market, and a strong Australian dollar which has seen a number of wine companies dump stock into the market after suffering cancellations in some big export orders. All of this has been a boon for the supermarket chains whose modus operandi is to screw the best price out of producers.
This, coupled with heavy price discounting as Foster's tries to regain some of the market share it has lost in the past few years, has made it a good time to be a consumer. For instance, brands such as Crown Lager can be bought for less than $40 a case, which is the cheapest it has been for five years. Three years ago Foster's was wholesaling a slab of Crown for $43.80.
Parallel importing is also hurting business as supermarket chains and some of the bigger independent bottleshop chains bypass Australian brand licensees and import from third parties in countries including Brazil, Malaysia and the US.
Parallel importing hit record levels in the past year as the dollar continued to strengthen and retailers, looking for ways to drive prices down and exert control over their suppliers, became more aggressive in importing.
Parallel importing allows retailers to bring in batches of cut-price beer or other alcohol independently of the official distributors. It occurs where companies set different price points for their products in different markets. For instance, Moet might be sold in France at one price, in Asia at another and in Australia at a different price again. Parallel importers source the cheaper product and undercut what it ordinarily would cost in Australia.
For liquor suppliers such as Foster's, Lion Nathan and Coca-Cola Amatil, which hold various licences, they lose revenue each time their customers, who include the big retail chains and independent liquor stores, source products such as Corona, Stella, Becks and Peroni from third parties.
Foster's generates more than $70 million a year in profits from its licence to sell Stella and Corona. If more than 20 per cent of product is being leached by parallel importing, this is conceivably costing Foster's tens of millions a year in sales.
In premium spirits, where the margins are juicier, parallel importing is rampant. In spirits, which represent an estimated $3 billion of total alcohol sold in Australia, it makes sense to source premium spirits because the same amount of duty is paid regardless of the quality. For instance, Christmas some liquor outlets are selling Chivas Regal for less than $36.90 a bottle, when it normally sells for about $48.
Where the discounting and margin crunching ends is anybody's guess.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
What is the proposed Foster's Group demerger and why does it matter to investors?
Foster's plans to split into separate beer and wine businesses, with new boards and chief executives announced ahead of the December half-year close. For investors this matters because the demerger could change capital structure, strategic focus and shareholder value, and the article suggests the move comes at a turbulent time for Australia's $20 billion-plus alcohol industry.
Who will run the new Foster's beer and wine companies after the split?
The article names David Dearie and John Pollaers as the chief executives for the wine and beer businesses (respectively). David Crawford is slated to be chairman of the beer business with Michael Ulmer as a director, while Max Ould is proposed as chairman of the wine business with Lyndsey Cattermole on that board. Group boss Ian Johnston will not hold a role in either of the proposed businesses.
How did the leadership announcements affect staff morale at Foster's?
According to the article, naming the new boards and senior managers was partly designed to pep up very low staff morale and give employees clarity about who will lead each entity. The appointments were seen as a morale boost even if they don't necessarily accelerate the demerger timetable.
Is there a chance Foster's wine business could be sold instead of listed?
Yes. The article says speculation is mounting that Constellation Brands may sell its Australian wine business and that Foster's wine unit could either be spun out as a separate listed entity or sold to the highest bidder, so a sale is a plausible outcome.
What is parallel importing and how is it impacting Australian alcohol companies like Foster's?
Parallel importing is when retailers source the same branded alcohol from third parties in other countries (for example Brazil, Malaysia or the US) where it's cheaper, then sell it in Australia at lower prices. The article reports record levels of parallel importing driven by a strong Australian dollar, and says it undercuts official distributors, erodes licence revenues and may be costing companies such as Foster's tens of millions of dollars a year.
Why are beer and spirits prices so cheap right now and what does that mean for consumers?
Heavy discounting by suppliers trying to regain market share, supermarkets squeezing producer margins and parallel importing have pushed retail prices down. The article gives examples: Crown Lager can be bought for less than $40 a case (the cheapest in five years) and some outlets were selling Chivas Regal for under $36.90 at Christmas, well below typical prices—making it a good time for consumers to buy.
How much profit does Foster's earn from licences like Stella and Corona, and how vulnerable is that revenue?
The article states Foster's generates more than $70 million a year in profits from its licence to sell Stella and Corona. It warns that if parallel importing leaches more than 20% of product volumes, this could conceivably cost Foster's tens of millions of dollars in lost sales and licence revenue.
What broader industry risks should everyday investors watch in Australia's alcohol sector?
Key risks highlighted include a strong Australian dollar prompting stock dumping and cancelled export orders, record parallel importing that undercuts official distributors, aggressive supermarket negotiating and heavy price discounting that squeeze margins, and boards that may lack specific alcohol, marketing or finance expertise—factors that can affect profitability and share value.