InvestSMART

More to be done on managing risk: APRA

SEVERAL banks have already satisfied upcoming rules that will force lenders to hold more liquid assets, the regulator says, despite industry concerns the requirements are being implemented too quickly.
By · 28 Feb 2013
By ·
28 Feb 2013
comments Comments
SEVERAL banks have already satisfied upcoming rules that will force lenders to hold more liquid assets, the regulator says, despite industry concerns the requirements are being implemented too quickly.

The comments came as the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority told the industry there was "more work to be done" in how it dealt with risk management.

Banks in Europe were granted a major reprieve last month, when global regulators delayed the starting date for new liquidity rules by four years, so that they did not commence until 2019.

Local banks are keenly awaiting APRA's decision on whether it will follow the lead of its peers overseas and soften the rules. A decision is expected soon.

APRA's chairman, John Laker, said on Wednesday the regulator had not yet put its proposal to industry on the liquidity coverage ratio, which will require banks to hold enough liquid assets to cover their lending outflows for a month. However, he also said there were "a number of institutions and banks" that had already satisfied the rules, part of a set of regulations known as Basel III.

Dr Laker added the rationale of phasing in Basel III "was to ensure the LCR can be introduced without material disruption to the orderly strengthening of banking systems or the ongoing financing of economic activity".

The remarks come after the Australian Bankers' Association last month warned there was a danger domestic regulations would be out of sync with the rest of the world if it proceeded with the rules too quickly.

Dr Laker made the comments after saying a recent review had found many boards in the industry needed to lift their game in how they managed risks. Its December review of risk governance had found the typical board in the industry had received a score that was at the "risky" end of "adequate". Some boards received a "high-risk" score.

"This is confirmation that APRA has indeed raised its expectations for risk governance and there is more work to be done," he said.

Despite the need for improvement, Dr Laker said APRA would not adopt certain measures favoured by its British counterparts, including sitting in on board meetings and conducting rigorous interviews of prospective directors of banks and financial institutions.
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

APRA’s chairman John Laker said several banks have already met the upcoming liquidity rules under Basel III, though the regulator has not yet put its Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) proposal to industry. APRA also said there is “more work to be done” on how the industry manages risk.

The LCR is a Basel III requirement that will force banks to hold enough liquid assets to cover their expected lending outflows for a month. For everyday investors and depositors, the LCR is intended to strengthen a bank’s short‑term resilience by ensuring it has liquid assets available in stress scenarios.

Basel III is a set of global banking regulations, including the LCR, designed to strengthen bank capital and liquidity. APRA says phasing in Basel III is intended to introduce the LCR without materially disrupting the orderly strengthening of banking systems or the ongoing financing of economic activity.

European regulators recently delayed the start of new liquidity rules by four years so they begin in 2019, and Australian banks are keenly awaiting APRA’s decision on whether it will take a similar approach. APRA has not announced a decision yet; a ruling is expected soon.

APRA’s December review of risk governance found many boards scored at the ‘risky’ end of ‘adequate’ and some received a ‘high‑risk’ score. John Laker said this confirms APRA has raised its expectations for risk governance and that more work is required across the industry.

No. Dr John Laker said APRA will not adopt certain measures used by its British counterparts, such as sitting in on board meetings or conducting rigorous interviews of prospective directors of banks and financial institutions.

The Australian Bankers’ Association warned there is a danger domestic regulations could be out of sync with the rest of the world if Australia proceeds with the liquidity rules too quickly, which is why many banks are watching APRA’s upcoming decision.

The article says a decision from APRA on whether to follow overseas delays or how it will implement the LCR is expected soon. Investors should watch APRA announcements for the regulator’s formal proposal and timing.