InvestSMART

Mergers at snail's pace

A long-awaited rebound in global mergers is taking its time to arrive. But for all the hand-wringing by bankers and lawyers, the business of arranging deals has not quite disappeared yet.
By · 3 Jul 2013
By ·
3 Jul 2013
comments Comments
A long-awaited rebound in global mergers is taking its time to arrive. But for all the hand-wringing by bankers and lawyers, the business of arranging deals has not quite disappeared yet.

Despite a strong start that yielded four blockbuster transactions in one week, the first half of 2013 was the slowest first six months for mergers in four years. Deals worth about $US996.8 billion were announced in that period, a sum that was down 13 per cent compared with a year earlier, according to data from Thomson Reuters.

The number of deals announced worldwide for the first six months was 16,808, the fewest for the period since 2003.

The slack pace has confounded many advisers, who continue to see an abundance of the traditional building blocks of a merger boom.

"We're seeing buyers and sellers talk about deals, only to see them die in the marketplace," said Scott Barshay, from US law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore.

The price of borrowing money remains near record lows, giving buyers relatively low costs for acquisitions.

"I think the reason activity is more muted is that many of today's decision-makers were also in very important seats during the financial crisis," said Michael Carr, head of mergers and acquisitions in the Americas at Goldman Sachs. "They saw what happened in the markets, and those memories will take a long time to fade."
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Global M&A activity has been slow to rebound. Despite a strong start that produced four blockbuster transactions in one week, the first half of 2013 was the slowest opening six months for mergers in four years: about $US996.8 billion of deals were announced, down 13% versus the same period a year earlier, and only 16,808 deals were announced—the fewest for that period since 2003 (Thomson Reuters).

The article notes a paradox: borrowing costs remain near record lows, which should make acquisitions cheaper, but many deals are still failing to close. Advisers say buyers and sellers talk about deals only to see them die in the marketplace, and some senior decision‑makers remain cautious because of memories from the financial crisis—factors that are muting activity despite cheap finance.

Low borrowing costs reduce the price of financing acquisitions and typically support deal-making. The article confirms that the price of borrowing remains near record lows, giving buyers relatively low acquisition costs, but it also notes that cheap finance alone has not yet translated into a sustained merger boom.

Not necessarily. While the market saw a brief surge that produced four big deals in one week, the overall picture for the first half of 2013 was still weak. That early flurry did not prevent H1 2013 from being the slowest six‑month period for mergers in four years, indicating only a patchy or tentative recovery so far.

Advisers are puzzled because many of the traditional conditions for a deal boom exist, such as cheap credit, but deals often stall. Scott Barshay of Cravath, Swaine & Moore observed buyers and sellers discuss transactions only to have them die in the marketplace. Michael Carr of Goldman Sachs suggested decision‑makers who were in key roles during the financial crisis remain cautious, and those memories continue to influence behaviour.

The deal value and volume figures cited in the article come from Thomson Reuters data, which reported about $US996.8 billion of announced deals in the first half of 2013 and 16,808 transactions for that period.

The article does not give personal financial advice, but it highlights a slower pace of merger deals despite cheap borrowing. For investors, this means fewer corporate takeover events driving share prices in the near term. Investors who rely on M&A as a catalyst should monitor deal flow and corporate announcements, but any portfolio changes should be based on individual goals and, if needed, professional advice.

The article suggests that while structural supports for deals (like low borrowing costs) exist, behavioural factors—chiefly the caution of decision‑makers shaped by the financial crisis—are holding activity back. A revival would likely require increased confidence among those leaders and more deals moving past initial discussions into firm announcements and closings.