InvestSMART

Medical tourism boom raises superbug risk

A GROWING number of patients travelling overseas for surgery are putting themselves and the Australian health system at risk from deadly superbugs, infectious disease experts say.
By · 14 May 2011
By ·
14 May 2011
comments Comments
A GROWING number of patients travelling overseas for surgery are putting themselves and the Australian health system at risk from deadly superbugs, infectious disease experts say.

Medical tourism companies say more people are choosing to have serious surgery overseas in a shift from the cheap, cosmetic procedures the industry has traditionally performed.

Global Health Travel managing director Cassandra Italia said her company flew about 40 Australian patients a month to countries such as India, Thailand and South Korea for treatments including spinal, orthopedic and bariatric surgery.

"In the last year and half, we've seen about a 70 per cent increase in people coming to us just because they don't want to sit on waiting lists," she said. "Some people are accessing their superannuation or re-mortgaging their houses to get their surgery done."

But the trend has alarmed experts, including the Austin Hospital's director of infectious diseases, Lindsay Grayson, who said many Australians had returned from overseas surgery extremely ill because they received poor care and picked up foreign superbugs organisms resistant to antibiotics.

Professor Grayson said the emergence of a new superbug known as NDM-1 which originated in India and has been found in several Australian patients who had travelled overseas was "genuinely scary" because unlike other bugs, it could proliferate and colonise other healthy gut flora inside people's intestines, making them resistant to antibiotics.

"This is an incredible threat to the way we practise medicine at the moment, because the NDM-1 gene is resistant to everything except for two drugs, one of which is extremely old and toxic for the kidneys and another which is a very new drug but not very effective," he said.

"So this is making us very alert to any return traveller, let alone a medical tourist."

Peter Collignon, director of the infectious diseases unit and microbiology at Australian National University, said the threat from NDM-1 was so great that Australian hospitals should be made to isolate return medical tourists until they know they are not carrying superbugs that could contaminate hospitals.

"These people are risking bringing superbugs into our hospitals and that increases the risks for everyone else," he said.

Ms Italia said gender-selection IVF procedures were booming in Thailand because of the ban on it for non-medical reasons in Australia. Knee and hip replacements were increasingly popular among Australians not willing to wait six to 12 months for the procedures in the public hospital system, she said.

Central Queensland University economics lecturer Anita Medhekar, who is doing a PhD on the economics of medical tourism, said the industry was worth about $2 billion a year in India alone. She said top hospitals in Thailand and India were offering surgery for less than a third of the price charged in Western countries, describing it as "a win-win" for patients and developing countries.

Others disagree, arguing it drives up the cost of healthcare for local people in countries dealing with such issues as high infant and maternal mortality.

Ms Medhekar said the Indian government was promoting the country as a destination and whole medical cities were being created, complete with research centres and five-star hotels.

Ms Medhekar said groups including the not-for-profit Joint Commission International offered accreditation programs for hospitals around the world to establish minimum standards of quality and safety.

But Professor Collignon said such programs did not address the problem of antibiotic-resistant superbugs such as NDM-1, which has been found in the water supply in Delhi. "They are in a country that has very high amounts of antibiotic resistance . . . Those programs look at processes more directly to do with patient safety and don't take [superbugs] into account," he said.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

The article reports Australians are going overseas for serious surgery to avoid public hospital waiting lists and to save money. Medical tourism brokers say people are even accessing superannuation or remortgaging homes to pay for procedures, with about a 70% increase in enquiries to some providers over the past 18 months.

According to the article, popular destinations include India, Thailand and South Korea. Procedures commonly arranged include spinal, orthopedic and bariatric surgery, knee and hip replacements, and reproductive services such as gender-selection IVF in Thailand.

The article cites a researcher saying medical tourism is worth about $2 billion a year in India, and that top hospitals in Thailand and India can offer surgery for less than a third of the price charged in Western countries.

Infectious disease experts in the article warn that some returning patients have picked up antibiotic‑resistant organisms abroad, including the NDM‑1 superbug. These infections can leave patients very ill and pose a threat to domestic hospitals if they spread.

The article explains NDM‑1 can colonise healthy gut flora and is resistant to most antibiotics. Experts say it is only susceptible to two drugs — one is very old and kidney‑toxic and the other is new but not very effective — making it a serious threat to current medical practice.

The article notes that accreditation programs exist to set minimum safety and quality standards, but an expert quoted says these programs do not address environmental antibiotic resistance (for example, contaminated water supplies) and so may not prevent superbug exposure.

In the article, one expert recommends that hospitals should consider isolating return medical tourists until testing confirms they are not carrying antibiotic‑resistant superbugs, to reduce the risk of contaminating hospitals and exposing other patients.

The article highlights concerns that more Australians returning from overseas surgery sick with resistant infections could increase pressure on the health system and raise the risk of superbugs spreading in hospitals, which would affect other patients and clinical care practices.