InvestSMART

Macquarie news sparks high hopes

Investors are starting to load bull market expectations into Macquarie Group's share price if the reaction to chief executive Nicholas Moore's modest recasting of the group's profit outlook is a guide.
By · 26 Jul 2013
By ·
26 Jul 2013
comments Comments
Investors are starting to load bull market expectations into Macquarie Group's share price if the reaction to chief executive Nicholas Moore's modest recasting of the group's profit outlook is a guide.

With the usual caveat that it all depended on how the markets travelled, Moore told Macquarie's annual meeting that Macquarie boosted earnings in its first three months to the end of June and remained on track to beat its 2012-13 profit of $851 million in the full year. The market consensus is that earnings will be about 27 per cent higher.

Moore said that the components of the result would be slightly different than previously expected. The group's funds management business is growing faster than expected, picking up more performance fee income than anticipated and getting a boost from the decline in the value of the Australian dollar, so its expected profit contribution has been upgraded. Macquarie's resources project financing arm, on the other hand, will probably contribute less than expected, as the resources sector downturn creates some impairment charges.

Overall it's a wash, but Macquarie's shares fell by $1.07 or 2.3 per cent on Thursday because investors wanted a profit upgrade, sourced basically from the parts of Macquarie's business that were pounded hardest during the financial crisis: Macquarie Equities, and Macquarie Capital, the division that houses the group's corporate advisory business.

Macquarie is not within a country kilometre of the profits it was booking before the global crisis, and key profit catalysts including Macquarie's famous listed infrastructure funds management manufacturing machine have wound down.

There is however room for what Maquarie calls its "market facing" operations to significantly boost their profit contribution if the market recovery continues, and what is still a 25 per cent price gain for Macquarie since mid-April is partially built on the assumption that it is under way.

In its first-quarter update on Thursday, Macquarie confirmed predictions of higher earnings this year for both Macquarie Securities and Macquarie Capital. Both are building off depressed bases, however. In 2007-08, Macquarie lifted net profit by 23 per cent to $1.8 billion. Earnings before corporate expenses were $4.6 billion, and Macquarie Capital contributed $2.9 billion, 63 per cent of it. Equity market earnings were $732 million, 16 per cent of the total.

Within last year's $851 million profit, Macquarie Equities actually lost $50 million on top of a $194 million loss in the previous year. Macquarie Capital contributed $150 million, 17 per cent of the total.

The reduction in market-facing profits is the key to a slump in Macquarie's return on equity since the global crisis erupted.

Its $1.8 billion profit in 2007-08 represented a return on equity of 23.9 per cent, well above an average return of 11 per cent for a peer group of banks, and its 10-year average return was 25.1 per cent, again easily outstripping a peer group average return of 16.3 per cent. The $851 million profit in 2012-13 represented a return on equity of only 7.8 per cent. The three-year average return is 7.8 per cent, and Macquarie's 10-year return on equity now averages 17.3 per cent.

Macquarie remains ahead of its competitors on this important measure. An international peer group that includes Bank of America, Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and UBS returned 4 per cent on invested equity in 2012-13, and a 10 per cent return in the past decade.

The crisis has narrowed Macquarie's lead, however, and it is not clear that it will widen again if a bull market develops.

Moore said on Thursday that Macquarie Equities was back in profit in the June quarter, but a market recovery will tend to lift all broking and investment banking boats in that area.

And while measures of takeover activity vary, Macquarie Capital appears to be the third-ranked adviser by deal value in this market since 2011, behind the leader, Goldman Sachs, and UBS. It is also third ranked this year, behind Goldman and Lazard.

That's about as far down the league table as it will want to go. Takeover activity is still in the doldrums: KPMG reported on Thursday that deal numbers declined globally in the year to June and that the total value of deals was back to 2012 levels.

When takeovers take off, however, they are huge profit generators, not just on advice but in debt and equity takeover funding. Corporate advice was one of Macquarie's big edges before the crash. It has to be in the next boom, too, if the group is to outperform.

mmaiden@fairfaxmedia.com.au
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Macquarie’s shares dipped because investors had hoped for a clear profit upgrade. While CEO Nicholas Moore said first-quarter earnings were up and the group is on track to beat last year’s $851 million, some divisions that investors expected to drive a premium upgrade (notably Macquarie Equities and parts of Macquarie Capital) remain depressed, so the update wasn’t the strong positive surprise the market wanted.

Yes. Macquarie confirmed in its first-quarter update that earnings are higher this year and management said the group remained on track to beat the 2012–13 profit of $851 million. Market consensus mentioned in the article suggested earnings could be about 27% higher.

Macquarie’s funds management business is contributing more than expected—benefiting from stronger performance fees and a weaker Australian dollar—so its profit contribution was upgraded. By contrast, the resources project financing arm is likely to contribute less than expected because the resources-sector downturn is creating some impairment charges.

Very dependent. The article notes that Macquarie’s market-facing operations (like equities, securities and corporate advisory) can significantly boost profits if the market recovery continues. Management also said Macquarie Equities returned to profit in the June quarter, but a general market upswing would lift most broking and investment banking businesses.

Macquarie’s ROE has fallen since the pre-crisis peak. In 2007–08 the group posted a 23.9% ROE; its 10-year average then was 25.1%. By 2012–13 profit levels, ROE had dropped to 7.8%, the three-year average was 7.8%, and the 10-year average had moved to 17.3%—still ahead of many peers but a narrower lead than before the crisis.

Macquarie Capital appears to be the third-ranked adviser by deal value in the market since 2011, behind Goldman Sachs and UBS. It was also ranked third this year behind Goldman Sachs and Lazard, according to the article.

Takeover activity is very important. The article highlights that when takeovers pick up they generate huge profits—not just from advisory fees but also from debt and equity takeover funding. Corporate advice was one of Macquarie’s big edges before the crash and needs to recover in the next boom for the group to outperform again.

Despite the hit from the crisis, Macquarie remains ahead of many international peers on ROE. An international peer group (Bank of America, Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and UBS) returned about 4% on invested equity in 2012–13 and roughly 10% over the past decade, while Macquarie’s longer-term ROE averages remain higher, though the crisis narrowed its lead.