InvestSMART

Just breathing, not blowing bubbles

It seems the world is hitting the panic button that a property bubble is forming that if left to its own devices could wreak devastation on an already fragile global economy.
By · 19 Sep 2013
By ·
19 Sep 2013
comments Comments
It seems the world is hitting the panic button that a property bubble is forming that if left to its own devices could wreak devastation on an already fragile global economy.

In Australia the regulators are making headlines with warnings to the banks not to be lax with their lending requirements, along with comments in The Australian Financial Review by former Reserve Bank board member Bob Gregory that a property bubble "just seems to be inevitable".

It is a similar story in Britain with the Bank of England planning to meet as pressure mounts on it to look at what it can do to prevent a housing bubble emerging, and in China, where property prices have been soaring, the Chinese government is clamping down on speculative and investment driven property demand.

Such warnings are necessary in some countries, but Australia isn't there yet and when a few pertinent statistics are put into context then talk of a bubble starts to look sensationalist.

It prompted the Reserve Bank's assistant governor Malcolm Edey to step in and say such talk of bubbles in Australia was "alarmist". He said looking back over the past decade, house prices have risen at a rate "equivalent to or on average less than the growth of household incomes".

While it is true Australia has always been accused of having relatively high residential prices compared with the rest of the world, it is like comparing apples with oranges.

IBISWorld's Phil Ruthven put it well recently when he pointed out that 63 per cent of the nation's household assets, namely property, equipment and household durables, totals $8.4 trillion, and 12 per cent of our income goes to servicing the debt of $1.66 trillion (92 per cent of which is property mortgages). This is equivalent to a gearing of 20 per cent, which would be considered low if we were analysing a company.

It looks even less worrying when some of the statistics compiled by the country's biggest bank, Commonwealth Bank, are digested. In its annual results presentation it says mortgagee in possession represents 8 basis points of its portfolio balances, limited low doc lending is limited to 1.9 per cent of its total portfolio with stringent lending criteria and 80 per cent of customers pay in advance of their required monthly mortgage repayment.

In terms of debt servicing, figures compiled by Goldman Sachs indicate that in 2008,

13 per cent of household income was allocated to servicing mortgages, compared with less than 8 per cent in 2013.

It seems the property bubble that is worrying a number of commentators in Australia is largely isolated to Sydney and Perth's metropolitan areas. It is there that auction clearance rates have been hitting 80 per cent for most of the year, while in Melbourne they recently hit

75 per cent.

If this ends up in a property boom due to low interest rates, then that isn't a bad thing if the debt can be serviced. Indeed, if it spills over into new housing starts, it will help the building and construction sector, which has recently seen a spike in company collapses at the small end of the market.

Figures from the ABS show that the weighted average established house prices across eight capital cities rose 2.4 per cent between the March 2013 and June 2013 quarters and 5.1 per cent between June 2012 and June 2013. In Sydney weighted average house prices rose 2.7 per cent in the quarter, compared with 2.4 per cent for Melbourne, 1.9 per cent for Brisbane, 0.3 per cent for Adelaide and 3.4 per cent for Perth.

But it is the forecasts that are making people nervous. SQM Research predicts "significant" price rises for Sydney of between 15 to 20 per cent.

"Low interest rates and an improvement in sentiment towards the national economy will further drive buyer interest in the national housing market," the research report says. But it says Sydney is a "beast unto itself" and says Canberra will record house price falls of between 1 per cent and 4 per cent, Melbourne will record price rises of between 4 per cent and 7 per cent.

A concern is that the rise in prices is largely investment-driven, with AFG Mortgage Index reporting in August that an unprecedented 49.5 per cent of all home loans processed in NSW were for investors, followed by Victoria at 36.7 per cent, 35.8 per cent in Queensland, 32.9 per cent in South Australia and 28.4 per cent in Western Australia.

With the surge in self-managed super funds to more than

$500 billion, corporate regulator ASIC is concerned that some unsuspecting trustees will blow themselves up, given the growing number of property spruikers.

It is true that whenever there is a pot of money, crooks will descend, and retirement savings have always been prey. Self-managed super funds are merely the vehicle. Nevertheless it prompted the Reserve Bank to express concern that households might be building up too much debt by borrowing to buy property through SMSF.

The regulators have the power to crack down on the spruikers. Let's hope they do it soon.

Twitter: @Adele_ferguson
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Experts in the article offer mixed views. Reserve Bank assistant governor Malcolm Edey called talk of an Australian property bubble “alarmist,” noting house price rises over the past decade have been roughly in line with household income growth. Other commentators warn of localised overheating in Sydney and Perth, but national metrics such as household asset levels, gearing of about 20% (per IBISWorld), and relatively low mortgage distress figures suggest the situation is not a clear national bubble.

ABS figures in the article show weighted average established house prices across eight capitals rose 2.4% in the March–June 2013 quarter and 5.1% year‑on‑year. Quarter rises included Sydney 2.7%, Melbourne 2.4%, Brisbane 1.9%, Adelaide 0.3% and Perth 3.4%. Auction clearance rates were notably high in Sydney and Perth (around 80%) and about 75% in Melbourne, indicating stronger activity in those metropolitan markets.

Investment lending has been substantial. The AFG Mortgage Index cited in the article reported that in August an unprecedented 49.5% of home loans processed in New South Wales were for investors. Other states showed high investor shares too: Victoria 36.7%, Queensland 35.8%, South Australia 32.9% and Western Australia 28.4% — a pattern that raises concerns about investor‑led price pressure.

According to Commonwealth Bank data cited in the article, mortgagees in possession represent only 8 basis points (0.08%) of its portfolio balances, low‑doc lending is limited to 1.9% of the portfolio with stringent criteria, and about 80% of customers pay in advance of required monthly mortgage repayments. These figures suggest limited immediate stress in that major bank’s lending book.

No — servicing pressure has eased. Goldman Sachs figures quoted in the article show mortgage servicing took about 13% of household income in 2008 but had fallen to less than 8% by 2013, indicating households were allocating a smaller share of income to mortgage repayments in the period covered.

Yes — the article notes that if rising prices driven by low interest rates translate into new housing starts, that can support the building and construction sector. This would be especially helpful after a period of small‑end company collapses in construction, so a controlled upswing in building activity could have positive spillovers.

Regulators are concerned. With SMSF assets topping about $500 billion, ASIC warned that property spruikers can prey on trustees and that some SMSF trustees may over‑leverage to buy property. The Reserve Bank also expressed concern households might be taking on too much debt via SMSF property purchases. The article recommends regulatory action to curb risky spruiking.

SQM Research, as reported in the article, predicted “significant” price rises for Sydney of between 15% and 20%, calling Sydney a “beast unto itself.” It forecast Canberra house price falls of 1%–4% and Melbourne rises of about 4%–7%. These region‑specific forecasts are part of the concern about uneven, city‑by‑city housing dynamics.