AUSTRALIA'S mining and resource stocks could face tougher disclosure requirements, as the local bourse seeks to protect investors from confusing and misleading information.
The operator of the Australian Stock Exchange has flagged a series of changes to the way companies in the mining and energy sectors report the size and potential of their assets, under a review process launched yesterday.
A minefield of industry jargon confronts new investors to the mining sector, and the ASX revealed concerns yesterday that some companies were inappropriately taking advantage of that situation.
Among several concerns aired, the ASX said some companies had inappropriately used "exploration targets" to court investors with data that was speculative at best.
"It was not intended to provide an opportunity for reporting preliminary, low confidence estimates of tonnes and grade before there was sufficient data and confidence to report an inferred mineral resource," the ASX said in an issues paper.
The ASX also raised concerns that companies were luring investors with "production targets" that did not fall under the JORC Code, the accepted industry formula for measuring mineral resources.
The ASX raised the prospect of forcing companies to explain more about their production targets, including the financial assumptions underpinning the forecasts, and what proportion of the targets were reliant on further exploration.
Cultural differences and the varying standards of reporting required by different nations has also caused problems on the local bourse. The ASX indicated it was keen to see regulations for petroleum companies brought into line with the international standards created in 2007 by the Society of Petroleum Engineers. The Minerals Council of Australia could not be reached for comment yesterday, but the ASX said the moves were also aimed at efficiency, and it was wary of unnecessarily increasing the reporting burden carried by companies.
Australian Shareholders Association spokesman Vas Kolesnikoff welcomed the push towards tougher standards, saying it was a timely intervention given the large sums of money flowing towards resources stocks at the moment. "Disclosure has been complicated and confusing . . . Greater disclosure on the stage of exploration and certainty of the resource would clearly increase the knowledge base of investors."
Comments on the issues paper are being sought by the ASX until January 27.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
What disclosure changes is the ASX proposing for mining and resource companies?
The ASX has launched a review proposing tougher disclosure requirements for mining and energy companies to protect investors from confusing or misleading information. The issues paper flags concerns about how companies report exploration targets and production targets, seeks clearer explanations of production forecasts (including underlying financial assumptions), and looks to align petroleum reporting with international standards. The ASX is aiming for greater clarity without unnecessarily increasing reporting burdens.
Why is the ASX worried about companies using 'exploration targets' to attract investors?
The ASX says some companies have been inappropriately using 'exploration targets' to present speculative estimates of tonnes and grade. Exploration targets were not intended to serve as preliminary, low‑confidence resource estimates before there is enough data to report an inferred mineral resource, so the practice can mislead new investors about asset certainty.
What are 'production targets' and why might the ASX demand more detail from companies?
Production targets are company forecasts of future output. The ASX raised concerns that some production targets do not fall under the JORC Code (the accepted industry resource reporting standard) and may be used to lure investors. The ASX is considering forcing companies to disclose more about the assumptions behind production targets and what portion depends on further exploration.
How could tougher ASX disclosure rules affect everyday investors in resources stocks?
Stronger disclosure should make it easier for everyday investors to understand the stage of exploration and the certainty of reported resources, reducing the chance of being misled by speculative claims. That can improve investment decisions. The ASX also says it wants to balance greater transparency with not imposing unnecessary reporting costs on companies.
What is the JORC Code and why does it matter for resource reporting?
The JORC Code is the accepted industry framework for measuring and reporting mineral resources. The ASX flagged that some production targets being promoted to investors don't fall under JORC standards, which raises concerns about the reliability of those forecasts and reinforces the need for clearer, more consistent reporting.
Is the ASX seeking to align petroleum company reporting with international standards?
Yes. The ASX indicated it wants petroleum company regulations on the Australian bourse brought into line with international standards set out in 2007 by the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), addressing problems caused by cultural differences and varying national reporting standards.
Who has publicly supported the ASX push for tougher disclosure standards?
The Australian Shareholders Association welcomed the move. Spokesman Vas Kolesnikoff described the current disclosure regime as complicated and confusing and said greater disclosure on the stage of exploration and resource certainty would improve investors' knowledge.
How can investors comment on the ASX issues paper and what is the deadline?
The ASX is seeking comments on the issues paper to inform its review. According to the article, comments are being sought until January 27. Investors and stakeholders can submit feedback by that date to have their views considered.