InvestSMART

Independents warn on Rudd leadership switch

The two country independents propping up the Gillard government have warned of an early election if there is a switch to Kevin Rudd, as key powerbroker Bill Shorten indicated he remains rusted on to the Prime Minister.
By · 21 Jul 2012
By ·
21 Jul 2012
comments Comments
The two country independents propping up the Gillard government have warned of an early election if there is a switch to Kevin Rudd, as key powerbroker Bill Shorten indicated he remains rusted on to the Prime Minister.

THE two country independents propping up the Gillard government have warned of an early election if there is a switch to Kevin Rudd, as key powerbroker Bill Shorten indicated he remains rusted on to the Prime Minister.

With supporters of Julia Gillard and Mr Rudd in overdrive yesterday, sources close to Mr Shorten, who helped install Ms Gillard and strongly backed her against Mr Rudd in February, rejected any suggestion that he would change to backing Mr Rudd.

Neither Mr Shorten, who is Workplace Relations Minister, nor his former union, the Australian Workers Union, believed in being ''half-hearted'' in their support, the sources said. Mr Shorten - who has been in the United States this week for the Australian-American Dialogue - has been speculated about as a possible deputy prime minister if he moved to Mr Rudd.

Independent Tony Windsor said ''all bets would be off'', if there was a change of leader.

''Obviously the formation of government occurs on the floor of the House not in written agreements,'' said Mr Windsor, adding that his written agreement with Ms Gillard was ''not transferable''. ''A change of leaders would be a high-risk strategy that would open up the option of an early election.''

Fellow independent Rob Oakeshott (right) said he was focused on the very full policy agenda before Parliament. ''But if the Labor Party is more interested in focusing on the next election, then I will do what I can to oblige them with that next election.''

Mr Oakeshott said he reflected the mood of the majority of Australians who were ''utterly sick of leadership speculation''. He was not making a ''threat'' and would not be drawn on precisely what he would do if there was switch.

Labor had a ''simple choice. They've got at least 12 months with existing arrangements ? Or they could blow it up and away we go.''

Rudd sources sought to hose down the prospect of an early poll if he became PM, saying the independents would not want the term cut short.

The Gillard forces are talking up the premature election threat, which one senior figure said would mean ''early retirement for a lot of caucus members''. Gillard backers insist the unions - which are very much against a premature poll - are still fully behind Ms Gillard.

The unions were ''all rock solid'', said a Gillard strategist. ''Every single union, every single union leader is in the same place as they were'' during the February leadership ballot when Ms Gillard trounced Mr Rudd.

The Gillard forces flatly rejected reports this week that there has been some shift in the union movement, indicating it won't seek to or be able to protect Ms Gillard so effectively as the pressure on her leadership mounts. But Rudd sources claim ''the unions are reconsidering their position''.

Ms Gillard held a meeting last night with the leadership of national unions, discussing a range of policy and political issues. Earlier yesterday, they met the ALP national secretary George Wright. The meetings had been arranged some time ago but took on an extra edge after it was reported that a meeting of unions on Tuesday, which discussed setting up a fighting fund and levying union members, had canvassed the prospect of Labor changing to Mr Rudd.

Tony Abbott, also in the US for the Dialogue, pointed to the spectre of the ''faceless men''.

Reacting to a threat by Transport Workers Union chief Tony Sheldon to withhold donations from the ALP if it dumped Ms Gillard, Mr Abbott said: ''The general public think that they should be choosing the Prime Minister, not subcontracting the job out to faceless men, and when union leaders start making these kinds of threats I think it worries people. They think that the Labor Party is the plaything of unelected union officials, not the servant of the Australian people.''

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

According to the article, the two country independents who support the Gillard government warned that a change to Kevin Rudd could open up the option of an early election. Tony Windsor described a leader change as a "high‑risk strategy" that could mean "all bets would be off," while Rudd sources sought to downplay that prospect. In short, the piece presents a leadership switch as a real risk for an early poll.

The article names independents Tony Windsor and Rob Oakeshott as the key country independents propping up the Gillard government. Windsor said his written agreement with Julia Gillard was "not transferable" and warned a leader change would put the formation of government at risk. Oakeshott said he was focused on policy but warned he would act if Labor chose to focus on the next election.

Sources close to Bill Shorten indicated he remained firmly supportive of Prime Minister Julia Gillard. The article says Shorten — the Workplace Relations Minister — was described as "rusted on" to the Prime Minister and those close to him rejected suggestions he would shift to back Kevin Rudd.

The article reports Gillard backers saying unions are "all rock solid" behind Julia Gillard, with national union leaders meeting Ms Gillard and ALP officials. It also notes competing claims: Rudd sources suggested unions might be reconsidering, and Transport Workers Union chief Tony Sheldon threatened to withhold donations if the ALP dumped Ms Gillard.

No. Tony Windsor explicitly said his written agreement with Julia Gillard was "not transferable," and he reminded that the formation of government occurs on the floor of the House, not via written agreements — implying a leadership change would not automatically carry over existing support.

Rob Oakeshott said he reflected the mood of the majority of Australians who were "utterly sick of leadership speculation." He stressed he was focused on the parliamentary policy agenda and said he would not be drawn on precise actions, but suggested he would act if Labor focused on an early election.

Tony Abbott criticized what he called the influence of "faceless men," warning that the public expects the Prime Minister to be chosen by voters rather than being influenced by unelected union officials. He referenced the threat by a union boss to withhold donations as an example of worrying behaviour.

Based on the article, investors should monitor developments around any Labor leadership challenge (reports of a switch from Gillard to Rudd), public statements from the key independents Tony Windsor and Rob Oakeshott, Bill Shorten’s position, and union activity or threats (such as meetings, lobbying or donation threats). The article presents these factors as central to whether a leadership change could lead to an early election or broader political uncertainty.