InvestSMART

Greens are plain wrong on fisheries

THIS is your last chance to halt the insidious spread of marine parks, with fewer than 60 days remaining in the final consultation period for the proposed national network of marine parks covering more than a third of Commonwealth waters.
By · 15 Jul 2012
By ·
15 Jul 2012
comments Comments
THIS is your last chance to halt the insidious spread of marine parks, with fewer than 60 days remaining in the final consultation period for the proposed national network of marine parks covering more than a third of Commonwealth waters.

"Australia's fisheries are among the best managed in the world but it seems Minister Burke is committed to doing the Greens' bidding and will push ahead with locking Australians out of Australia, and denying families and fishing businesses access to our abundant fish stocks," the Coalition spokesman on fisheries, Richard Colbeck said.

Using sound science to assess our fish stocks, the Australian Fish Management Authority reveals they are already sustainable, healthy and productive. In fact, they are touted as a sustainable model before the world.

"In contrast, the government's proposed network of marine parks lacks any scientific foundation and is based on the demands of the Greens and environment groups," says Senator Colbeck, and angling lobby groups.

Meantime, evidence was apparently presented at last week's International Coral Reef Symposium that proves marine protected areas provide a "baby bonus" to neighbouring fisheries.

The study was carried out in the Keppel Island group using DNA samples. A team of scientists tracked the dispersal pathways of juvenile coral trout and stripey snappers' larvae to adjoining areas.

They found that a very large proportion of juveniles, 65 per cent, settled in nearby areas that are open to fishing. Of course, this is nothing new, as the currents have carried fish larvae since time immemorial.

Anglers and commercial fishers are united in believing size, bag limit and tackle restrictions are better fisheries management tools than un-Australian lock-outs.

Closer to home, west to north-westerly winds will be the bugbear of blue-water anglers. But with little swell, they're not a bad wind for sitting on the anchor and hanging off a shallow reef or drop-off.

Snapper, kingfish, trevally, morwong, pigfish and big calamari are stationed on the close reefs. Long Reef has produced snapper to 5 kilograms and kingfish along the wall.

Schools of Aussie salmon are easy to find around the headlands, while lure trollers will hook tailor and bonito. Beach fishers are scoring oodles of tailor and salmon, too.

Hawkesbury guide Ron Osman adds that the luderick are about in good numbers in Brisbane Water and doubtless his spots in the Hawkesbury near Brooklyn, where jewfish is being landed.

Cowan Creek still has hairtail - and crowds - but Pittwater is quiet. Target John Dory around the Newport moorings, and bream and flathead in Narrabeen Lake.

But the big news is the Southern bluefin run off Sydney. The fish have been in a frenzy. Another example of environmentalists getting it wrong?

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

The article says the government has proposed a national network of marine parks that would cover more than a third of Commonwealth waters. It's controversial because opponents — including Coalition spokesman Richard Colbeck, angling lobby groups and many commercial fishers — argue the parks would “lock Australians out,” deny families and fishing businesses access to fish stocks, and lack a scientific foundation. Supporters and environment groups back the parks, and the proposal was in a final consultation period with fewer than 60 days remaining.

Yes. The article cites the Australian Fish Management Authority (AFMA), reporting that, using sound science, Australia’s fisheries are already sustainable, healthy and productive and are touted as a sustainable model before the world.

The article reports that evidence presented at the International Coral Reef Symposium suggests marine protected areas can provide a 'baby bonus' to neighbouring fisheries. A DNA-based study in the Keppel Island group tracked larvae and found a large proportion of juveniles settled in nearby areas open to fishing, which supporters of MPAs cite as a benefit.

Scientists used DNA samples to track dispersal pathways of juvenile coral trout and stripey snapper larvae around the Keppel Island group. They found that about 65% of juveniles settled in nearby areas that are open to fishing, indicating substantial larval export from protected to fished areas.

According to the article, anglers and commercial fishers favour targeted management tools such as size limits, bag limits and tackle restrictions rather than large-scale lock-outs (no-take zones) imposed by marine parks.

Opponents quoted in the article argue that the proposed parks would deny access to abundant fish stocks and harm families and fishing businesses by restricting where people can fish. Those critics say the parks are being driven by Greens and environment groups rather than by science.

The article describes west to north-westerly winds with little swell — generally good for sitting on anchor near shallow reefs. Reported species and hotspots include snapper (up to 5 kg at Long Reef), kingfish along the wall, trevally, morwong, pigfish, calamari on close reefs, Aussie salmon around headlands, tailor and bonito for lure trollers, tailor and salmon from beaches, luderick and jewfish in the Hawkesbury/Brisbane Water area, hairtail in Cowan Creek, John Dory at Newport moorings, bream and flathead in Narrabeen Lake, and a strong Southern bluefin run off Sydney.

The article states there were fewer than 60 days remaining in the final consultation period, and the proposed national network of marine parks would cover more than one-third of Commonwealth waters.