Fund chief warns of super tinkering
Australian Super chief executive Ian Silk has also called for the industry to be "depoliticised", warning that Canberra's constant tinkering with the system is causing people to lose faith in it.
Speaking at the Stockbrokers' Association annual conference on Friday, Mr Silk said the $1.5 trillion super system should not be used by governments as a "revenue generating vehicle" whenever the budget came around.
"Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could depoliticise [it]," he said.
In April, federal Superannuation Minister Bill Shorten announced plans to establish a council of superannuation "custodians" who would assess future changes to the super system against an agreed charter of values.
The council would be able to make changes to the super system in an apolitical way, as "the Reserve Bank makes decisions about interest rates," Mr Shorten said about the plan.
But the proposal has received a cool response from the opposition. Senator Mathias Cormann said his party opposed a "new bureaucracy".
In recent months, debate has also flared up about plans to lift the rate of compulsory superannuation contributions from 9 per cent to 12 per cent. Opposition Leader Tony Abbott said in his budget reply speech that he would delay by two years any increase in compulsory contributions because businesses could not afford it now, given the state of the economy.
But Mr Silk said Mr Abbott's plan was "another example" of political tinkering that could reduce public confidence in the superannuation system, "by virtue of being yet another change to what peoples' expectations and understandings were".
"I thought Bill Shorten's idea was a very good one," Mr Silk said, in reference to the plan to establish a council of super custodians.
"The fact that he's put it into the public realm and it was so forthrightly rejected suggests that it might not have legs itself," he said.
"But the notion that superannuation is taken out of the partisan pie-throwing environment of politics is one that would be welcomed by the industry but more particularly would be enthusiastically embraced by members of superannuation funds."
Australian Super looks after the super of 2 million members with $59 billion in savings.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The federal opposition has proposed removing a tax rebate on superannuation contributions for low-income earners. The article says Australian Super's chief warned this 'retrograde' move would hurt around 3 million Australians.
Ian Silk, chief executive of Australian Super (the country's biggest super fund), warned that Canberra's constant tinkering is causing people to lose faith in the super system. He made these remarks at the Stockbrokers' Association annual conference.
To 'depoliticise' superannuation is to take decisions about the system out of short-term partisan politics. Ian Silk argued the $1.5 trillion system should not be used as a 'revenue‑generating vehicle' by governments, and said depoliticising would help restore public confidence among members.
Federal Superannuation Minister Bill Shorten proposed setting up a council of superannuation 'custodians' to assess future changes against an agreed charter of values. The idea is that the council could make apolitical decisions about super, similar to how the Reserve Bank makes interest-rate choices.
The proposal received a cool response from the opposition. Senator Mathias Cormann called it a 'new bureaucracy' and the article notes the public rejection suggests the idea 'might not have legs,' according to Ian Silk.
There has been debate about lifting compulsory employer super contributions from 9% to 12%. Opposition Leader Tony Abbott said he would delay the increase by two years, arguing businesses could not afford it given the economy. Ian Silk said such moves are another example of political tinkering that could undermine confidence.
The article refers to a $1.5 trillion national superannuation system. Australian Super, the fund mentioned, looks after the super of 2 million members with about $59 billion in savings.
According to the article, frequent policy changes and debate over things like tax rebates or contribution rates can reduce public confidence and alter members' expectations. Ian Silk said removing super from partisan 'pie‑throwing' would be welcomed by the industry and, more importantly, by fund members.
Call 1300 880 160
Start a chat
Schedule a call
