Fortescue sets tough line in Pilbara
Ending a week of intense strategic positioning in the Pilbara iron ore industry, Fortescue sent a six-page argument to regulators on Friday outlining why Brockman should not be allowed onto its railway under third party access laws.
The access stoush is one of several crucial transport transactions that are unfolding in the iron ore sector, which has entered a pivotal phase now that iron ore prices have gone past their peak.
Speaking through its wholly owned infrastructure subsidiary on Friday, Fortescue extended its previous arguments by saying there would be no spare capacity on its railway within a year unless significant amounts of money were spent building extra loops and other extensions into the track.
"In order to determine whether any extension or expansion is technically, or indeed economically feasible there is a significant amount of work at considerable cost that needs to be undertaken," Fortescue said.
Fortescue said Brockman merely wanted "the option" of using its railway at some time in the future, rather than certain use, which was at odds with the spirit of the third party laws. Fortescue also fired a shot across the bows of the regulators, demanding access to evidence used in all future decision-making "so as to minimise any potential administrative errors".
The debate comes at an awkward time for Fortescue, which is trying to sell a stake in its rail and port assets under a transaction that is likely to see external companies use its railway in the future.
Fortescue expects to earn several billion dollars by selling the minority stake.
Any buyer, however, is likely to want their investment to grow, thereby requiring more and more iron ore to use the railway in future years.
The industry is also closely watching whether Gina Rinehart's Roy Hill project persists with plans to build its own railway to Port Hedland, or favours a lower-cost transport solution of using another company's existing railway.
Friday's missive from Fortescue followed several days of positioning by Brockman, which on Wednesday signed a deal with transport provider Aurizon to supply whichever transport solution the company eventually chooses for its exports.
That deal would theoretically mean Aurizon would build spur lines onto Fortescue's line should Brockman win its third party access application.
On Thursday Brockman announced a co-operation agreement with fellow Pilbara junior Flinders Mines that will lead the pair to progress their iron ore projects together to ensure cost savings and economies of scale.
Executives from Brockman and Flinders said the agreement could ultimately see the two companies conduct a full financial merger, among other options.
The climate of haste and tension in the Pilbara reflects the state of the iron ore industry, where prices are widely expected to fall in the years ahead, forcing companies to rush their product into the market as quickly as possible.
Yet despite the fading prices and sense of desperation, iron ore remains Australia's most lucrative export industry.
It is always warm in the Pilbara, but the past week has showed things are heating up more than usual.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The dispute centres on Brockman Mining seeking third‑party access to Fortescue Metals Group’s Pilbara railway so it can export iron ore. Fortescue argues Brockman is unable to fund the necessary track upgrades, says there will be no spare capacity within a year unless significant spending is made, and has lodged detailed objections with regulators.
If Fortescue is right and the railway lacks spare capacity, new users would need costly loops and extensions before accessing the line. That raises capital and timing risks for juniors like Brockman and could influence the value of Fortescue’s rail and port assets that it is trying to sell.
Fortescue expects to raise several billion dollars by selling a minority stake. For investors, that sale could change who uses the railway in future (buyers will likely want growth), and it may create new conflicts or agreements over third‑party access depending on regulatory decisions.
Brockman and Flinders have a cooperation agreement to progress iron ore projects together to achieve cost savings and economies of scale. Executives say the deal could eventually lead to a full financial merger, which investors should watch as it could change project economics and funding profiles.
Brockman signed a deal with transport provider Aurizon to deliver whichever transport solution Brockman chooses. If Brockman wins third‑party access, Aurizon could theoretically build spur lines connecting Brockman to Fortescue’s railway, subject to approvals and technical feasibility.
The article notes iron ore prices have passed their peak and are widely expected to fall, prompting producers to rush product to market. That creates pressure on margins and increases the urgency to secure transport capacity and scale operations quickly.
Investors are watching whether Gina Rinehart’s Roy Hill will proceed with building its own railway to Port Hedland or opt for the lower‑cost option of using an existing railway. The choice affects capital expenditure, timelines and competitive dynamics for rail access in the Pilbara.
Keep an eye on regulator decisions about third‑party rail access, progress of Fortescue’s minority stake sale, any announcements from Brockman, Aurizon or Flinders about transport or mergers, and iron ore price movements—each could materially affect project economics and company valuations.
Call 1300 880 160
Start a chat
Schedule a call
