Fortescue sets a tough line in the Pilbara
Ending a week of intense strategic positioning in the Pilbara iron ore industry, Fortescue sent a six-page argument to regulators on Friday outlining why Brockman should not be allowed onto its railway under third party access laws.
The access stoush is one of several crucial transport transactions that are unfolding in the iron ore sector, which has entered a pivotal phase now that iron ore prices have gone past their peak.
Speaking through its wholly owned infrastructure subsidiary on Friday, Fortescue extended its previous arguments by saying there would be no spare capacity on its railway within a year unless significant amounts of money were spent building extra loops and other extensions into the track.
"In order to determine whether any extension or expansion is technically, or indeed economically feasible there is a significant
amount of work at considerable
cost that needs to be undertaken," Fortescue said.
Fortescue said Brockman merely wanted "the option" of using its railway at some time in the future, rather than certain use, which was at odds with the spirit of the third party laws. Fortescue also fired a shot across the bows of the regulators, demanding access to evidence used in all future decision-making "so as to minimise any potential administrative errors".
The debate comes at an awkward time for Fortescue, which is trying to sell a stake in its rail and port assets under a transaction that is likely to see external companies use its railway in the future.
Fortescue expects to earn several billion dollars by selling the minority stake.
Any buyer, however, is likely to want their investment to grow, thereby requiring more and more iron ore to use the railway in future years.
The industry is also closely watching whether Gina Rinehart's Roy Hill project persists with plans to build its own railway to Port Hedland, or favours a lower-cost transport solution of using another company's existing railway.
Friday's missive from Fortescue followed several days of positioning by Brockman, which on Wednesday signed a deal with transport provider Aurizon to supply whichever transport solution the company eventually chooses for its exports.
That deal would theoretically mean Aurizon would build spur lines onto Fortescue's line should Brockman win its third party access application.
On Thursday Brockman announced a co-operation agreement with fellow Pilbara junior Flinders Mines that will lead the pair to progress their iron ore projects together to ensure cost savings and economies of scale.
Executives from Brockman and Flinders said the agreement could ultimately see the two companies conduct a full financial merger, among other options.
The climate of haste and tension in the Pilbara reflects the state of the iron ore industry, where prices are widely expected to fall in the years ahead, forcing companies to rush their product into the market as quickly as possible.
Yet despite the fading prices and sense of desperation, iron ore remains Australia's most lucrative export industry.
It is always warm in the Pilbara, but the past week has showed things are heating up more than usual.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
Fortescue says Brockman is "incapable" of funding the expansion needed to use its railway and argues there will be no spare capacity within a year unless costly loops and extensions are built. It also contends Brockman only wants the option of future use rather than guaranteed access, which Fortescue says conflicts with the spirit of third‑party access laws.
In a six‑page submission, Fortescue argued that technical and economic feasibility of any expansion requires significant work at considerable cost, that there will be no spare capacity without investment, and requested access to the evidence regulators use in future decisions to minimise potential administrative errors.
Fortescue is trying to sell a minority stake in its rail and port assets and expects to raise several billion dollars. Any buyer would likely want their investment to grow, which could require more iron ore to use the railway—so uncertainty over third‑party access and capacity could be material to the transaction and prospective investors.
Brockman signed a deal with transport provider Aurizon to supply the transport solution it chooses for exports. The article says that, in theory, Aurizon would build spur lines onto Fortescue's line if Brockman wins a third‑party access application, making Aurizon a practical partner in Brockman's access plans.
Brockman and fellow Pilbara junior Flinders Mines agreed to cooperate to progress their iron ore projects together to achieve cost savings and economies of scale. Executives said the deal could ultimately lead to a full financial merger, which investors should monitor as it could change project scale, costs and railway access needs.
With iron ore prices having passed their peak and widely expected to fall, companies in the Pilbara are under pressure to rush product to market and secure transport solutions. That sense of haste helps explain the flurry of strategic moves around rail access, asset sales and partnerships described in the article.
Fortescue says there will be no spare rail capacity within a year unless significant spending is made to add loops and extensions, and that determining feasibility involves substantial technical work and cost. These capacity constraints and upgrade expenses are central to whether third‑party applicants like Brockman can realistically access the line.
Investors should follow regulator decisions on Brockman's third‑party access application, progress on Fortescue's rail and port stake sale, any concrete merger moves between Brockman and Flinders, and announcements from Aurizon or Roy Hill about transport plans. These developments will affect rail capacity, potential revenue growth for buyers and the broader iron ore supply picture in the Pilbara.
Call 1300 880 160
Start a chat
Schedule a call
