Fortescue costs fall further
In the June quarter, cash costs fell to $US36.01 a tonne, down 17 per cent and coming in at the bottom end of market expectations of a range between $US36 and $US38 a tonne.
The decline here was booked against a rise in June quarter shipments of iron ore to 25 million tonnes, which lifted fiscal 2013 volumes by 41 per cent to 80.9 million tonnes, it said.
In the month of June alone, the "shipping run rate" hit an annualised 120 million tonnes, which was 5 million tonnes ahead of expectations, it said.
"We'd like to think we will do better than that," Fortescue's chief executive, Nev Power, said of the cost performance.
During the quarter, production from the Firetail deposit was ramped up, with the focus now shifting to tapping the Kings deposit which may lift costs for a time, ahead of the benefits flowing from the higher output, he said.
But the addition of further completed processing facilities will allow a further reduction in operating costs, he said. Fortescue was critical of the pressure from smaller operators such as Brockman Resources, which has been seeking access to its railway network.
"We welcome third parties on our network," Mr Powers said, pointing out that it has already shipped more than 11 million tonnes of ore of other miners. But at the same time, there is a need to de-bottleneck the railway network to handle these shipments.
"Therefore any third party must pay their way," he said. "We're not proposing to subsidise uneconomic projects to get them up and provide a solution for them."
Fortescue maintained its optimism over the outlook for the iron ore price, which it expects to range between $US110 and $US130 a tonne. No minerals resource rent tax (MRRT) was payable during the June quarter, the company said.
"We're not seeing any MRRT in our future... we haven't even booked the tax benefit that's available to us," a company official said.
Fortescue continued to hose down speculation of any imminent sale of equity in its port and transport assets, saying that it has "nothing further to add" on the sale.
At the same time, it is continuing to seek pre-payments from customers, which is helping to lift its cash stockpile, which stood at $2.2 billion at the end of June.
"A particular take-out was the fact that the cash cost at $US36.01 a tonne was lower than guidance," one institutional analyst said of the June quarter production report.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
Fortescue cut operating costs by ramping up output and throughput at its beneficiation plants and increasing shipments. Cash costs fell 17% to US$36.01 a tonne in the June quarter, landing at the bottom end of market guidance of US$36–US$38 a tonne.
Fortescue shipped 25 million tonnes of iron ore in the June quarter. That lift helped push fiscal 2013 volumes up 41% to 80.9 million tonnes.
In June the shipping run rate annualised at 120 million tonnes, which was 5 million tonnes ahead of expectations. Fortescue’s management said they expect to do even better as processing and throughput improve.
Production from the Firetail deposit was ramped up during the quarter. The company is now shifting focus to the Kings deposit, which may temporarily lift costs as it is brought into production, but is expected to deliver benefits from higher output once fully online.
Fortescue downplayed speculation of an imminent sale, saying it has "nothing further to add" on any equity sale of its port and transport assets.
Fortescue is seeking pre-payments from customers to help alleviate cash pressures. Its cash stockpile stood at US$2.2 billion at the end of June.
Fortescue said it welcomes third parties on its network and has already shipped more than 11 million tonnes of ore for other miners. However, it stressed the need to de-bottleneck the railway to handle extra shipments and said any third party must "pay their way" — the company won’t subsidise uneconomic projects.
Fortescue remains optimistic on iron ore prices, expecting a range of US$110–US$130 a tonne. The company reported no MRRT payable during the June quarter and said it is not seeing MRRT in its future, noting it hasn't even booked the tax benefit available to it.

