THE Telstra director Geoffrey Cousins has called on large shareholders in Fairfax Media to block Gina Rinehart from gaining a board seat.
He expressed concerns that the mining magnate might attempt to exert her influence over the editorial direction of its newspapers and radio stations.
The former pay-TV boss called on Mrs Rinehart to "come out and explain" her motivations if she pushes for a board seat.
Mrs Rinehart, Australia's richest woman, this week snared a 14 per cent stake in Fairfax, the owner of the Herald, The Age and 2UE, making her its single-biggest shareholder.
The raid on Fairfax follows Mrs Rinehart last year gaining a board seat at Ten Network Holdings after she amassed a 10 per cent stake in the broadcaster.
But Mr Cousins said Mrs Rinehart should not be allowed to exert her personal influence over Fairfax, including the editorial direction of its newspapers, if she gains a board seat.
"It is concerning that mining interests are seeking to control parts of the media in Australia. Quite clearly there are a lot of people in mining companies, and Gina Rinehart seems to be one, who don't like anybody placing any restrictions on their activities," Mr Cousins said.
Calls to Mrs Rinehart's office were not returned yesterday.
Mrs Rinehart and her representatives are believed to have not yet contacted Fairfax about the acquisition.
The fund manager Peter Morgan believed Mrs Rinehart's motivation was based on diversifying her investments as much as seeking influence through the media.
"Being a betting man I think the risk-reward [for Fairfax] is weighted towards the reward," he said. "I'd rather be buying [Fairfax] than BHP at $40 in terms of the cycle."
Mr Morgan said Mrs Rinehart's arrival was a "wake-up call" for Fairfax, but he believed its chairman, Roger Corbett, was strong enough to ensure that if she took a board seat, she would not impose undue influence.
Peter Mansell, the former chairman of West Australian Newspapers, said it was not easy for directors to influence the day-to-day editorial policy of a newspaper. "In my many years on the board of The West Australian, never once did I see any attempt by anyone to influence editorial decisions," Mr Mansell said yesterday.
"There's no way we'd sit down at a board meeting and talk about the editor's business."
Andrew Jaspan, a former editor of The Age, said any undue editorial influence would hurt the core business of Fairfax.
"The wheels of that business model will fall off if the mastheads simply become a propaganda sheet for the mining sector."
Although he agreed that Mr Corbett was a strong chairman, Mr Cousins conceded that it was "pretty difficult" for independent directors to stand up against shareholders who had gained cornerstone stakes in companies.
"They are supposed to ignore those interests and simply look at the interests of all shareholders ... but it is pretty difficult in some circumstances," he said.
Justin Diddams, an analyst with the investment bank Citigroup, said the latest developments highlighted how media assets were always in play.
"There's always a handful of wealthy individuals who covet the political influence that media assets can deliver, and Australia is no different in this regard," he said.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
What is the news about Gina Rinehart and her Fairfax stake?
Gina Rinehart has taken a 14% stake in Fairfax Media, making her the company’s single biggest shareholder. The move prompted Telstra director Geoffrey Cousins to urge large Fairfax shareholders to block her from gaining a board seat amid concerns about potential influence over the company’s newspapers and radio assets.
Why are investors worried about Gina Rinehart owning a large stake in Fairfax?
Investors and industry figures in the article expressed concern that mining interests could try to influence media editorial direction. Geoffrey Cousins warned about mining interests seeking control of parts of the media, while others said wealthy individuals can covet the political influence media assets deliver.
Could Gina Rinehart push for a Fairfax board seat after buying 14%?
The article notes that Rinehart’s 14% stake makes her the biggest shareholder and prompted calls for shareholders to block a board seat. It also points out she previously secured a board seat at Ten Network after building a 10% stake, which shows a large stake can lead to a push for board representation.
How might Rinehart’s stake affect Fairfax’s editorial independence?
Commentators in the article gave mixed views. Andrew Jaspan warned that undue editorial influence would damage Fairfax’s core business and turn mastheads into propaganda for the mining sector. By contrast, former chairman Peter Mansell said it’s difficult for directors to influence day‑to‑day editorial policy, and others argued Fairfax’s chairman Roger Corbett is strong enough to guard against undue influence.
What do investment experts say about the financial impact for Fairfax shareholders?
Fund manager Peter Morgan suggested Rinehart’s motivation could be diversification as well as influence, and he viewed the risk–reward for Fairfax as tilted toward reward. Morgan described her arrival as a ‘wake-up call’ but expressed confidence in Fairfax’s leadership to protect the business.
Has Gina Rinehart or her representatives contacted Fairfax about the purchase?
According to the article, calls to Rinehart’s office were not returned and her representatives were believed not to have yet contacted Fairfax about the acquisition.
What does this development say about media ownership and political influence in Australia?
Analyst Justin Diddams said the situation highlights that media assets are always in play and that a handful of wealthy individuals often covet the political influence media can deliver. The article frames Rinehart’s stake as part of that broader dynamic.
As an everyday investor, what should I watch for after Rinehart’s Fairfax share purchase?
Based on the article, investors should watch for any formal moves toward a board seat, communications from Fairfax and its chairman Roger Corbett, shareholder responses or votes, and commentary from credible managers and analysts about potential strategic or editorial changes. These developments will help indicate whether the stake is primarily financial or could lead to influence over the business.