InvestSMART

Employees 'being taken to the cleaners'

THE practice of "sham contracting" is ripping off commercial cleaning employees around Australia, Spotless Group chairman Peter Smedley says.
By · 9 Jul 2011
By ·
9 Jul 2011
comments Comments
THE practice of "sham contracting" is ripping off commercial cleaning employees around Australia, Spotless Group chairman Peter Smedley says.

There was a growing trend among cleaning firms to hire staff as self-employed contractors, either directly or through third parties, but these staff were actually employees by any legal or commercial definition, according to Mr Smedley.

These workers were missing out on pay and conditions, work cover, payroll tax and superannuation.

"The clear objective of this sham contracting is to purchase labour at a rate below fair market rates," Mr Smedley told a business function yesterday. He said he encouraged the private and public sectors to ensure they were not unknowingly complicit in such a practice.

"An uneven playing field arises when a buyer of commercial cleaning, including government, specifies award compliance as part of their outsource conditions and does not take responsibility to ensure that successful cleaning contractors are compliant," Mr Smedley said.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

Sham contracting is when cleaning firms label workers as self‑employed contractors even though, by legal or commercial definition, they are actually employees — a practice highlighted by Spotless Group chairman Peter Smedley.

According to the article, those misclassified miss out on pay and conditions they would get as employees, as well as entitlements such as work cover, payroll tax contributions and superannuation.

Peter Smedley says the clear objective of sham contracting is to buy labour at rates below fair market levels, effectively cutting labour costs by treating employees as independent contractors.

Mr Smedley warned there is a growing trend for cleaning firms to hire staff as self‑employed contractors — directly or through third parties — when those people are really employees, and he urged others to avoid being complicit.

The article explains an uneven playing field can arise when a buyer, including government, specifies award compliance in outsourcing conditions but does not take responsibility for ensuring successful cleaning contractors are actually compliant.

In this context, award compliance refers to the requirement that cleaning contractors meet the pay and employment conditions set out in relevant industrial awards — a standard some buyers require but may not actively enforce.

Everyday investors may want to monitor stories like this because industry practices flagged by leaders such as Peter Smedley can affect company reputations, competitive dynamics and the wider market practices in commercial cleaning.

The article relays Mr Smedley’s encouragement that both private and public sectors should check they are not unknowingly complicit and should take responsibility to ensure contracted cleaning firms are truly compliant with award conditions.