Elders fears 'irreparable harm' from cattle traders' defection
Elders made the allegations as part of a lawsuit against four of the seven rebel cattle traders.
The company has asked the court to stop the traders poaching clients and require them to return confidential information.
Elders also alleges the four traders targeted - George Last, Ashley James, Vincent Heeran and Mark Odgers - ran up expenses totalling more than $740,000 in nine months this year.
Details of planned shipments of thousands of live cattle are also exposed in court papers.
Ruralco, which has twice tried to merge with or take over Elders, poached the seven traders on October 1 to set up its own live cattle division. On the same day, Elders said it was investigating "certain discrepancies and issues" in cattle valuations at the export division. The company is to receive a report from forensic accountants at PPB Advisory this week.
The lawsuit against the four traders, filed in the Victorian Supreme Court, does not mention the alleged irregularities.
In an affidavit filed on October 25, senior Elders executive David Goodfellow said that if the four traders were not required to comply with strict non-compete clauses the impact on Elders subsidiary Elders Rural Services Australia (ERSAL) "would be catastrophic".
Under their employment contracts, Mr Last, Mr Heeran and Mr Odgers are banned from soliciting Elders clients for six months after they stop working for the company. Mr James has a non-compete clause lasting three months.
Mr Goodfellow said ERSAL "has been hampered by the sudden and unexpected loss of its entire trading team".
He said the ERSAL Australian network, of which he is group general manager, stood to lose 15 per cent of its total business if the non-compete clauses were not enforced.
"ERSAL has already received feedback from its customers regarding their concerns that it no longer has the capacity to fulfil its contractual obligations to them," he said.
Indonesia's TUM has been a major customer of Elders subsidiary North Australian Cattle Company for 10 years. Mr Goodfellow said TUM was considering an alternative supplier of live cattle.
Elders chief executive Malcolm Jackman declined to comment on potential damage to the company.
The company is to announce its full-year result on Monday and has foreshadowed an underlying loss of between $32 million and $39 million.
All four traders have told the court they have already returned to Elders all the confidential information they possessed.
In an affidavit, Mr Odgers, whom Elders alleged ran up expenses exceeding $100,000 between February and October, said it was a common practice for fellow employees to use his company credit card "for booking travel, accommodation, meals for customers/agents etc".
Mr Heeran, whose expenses bill allegedly came to more than $274,000 over the same period, said his card was also used to cover the expenses of staff and company agents.
Affidavits filed by Mr Last, whose expenses allegedly topped $136,000, and Mr James, whose expenses bill allegedly exceeded $228,000, do not disclose how the money was spent.
Mr Last told the court Elders had a "very strong" live cattle export order book, including "an aircraft load of 200 pregnant Holstein to Taiwan" next month and 11,000 cattle to be shipped to China early next year.
The defendants have been ordered not to approach former Elders clients before a trial, set down for November 25.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
Elders is facing significant challenges due to the defection of its live cattle trading team to rival company Ruralco. This move threatens to cause 'irreparable harm' to Elders' business, as a major Indonesian customer is considering purchasing cattle elsewhere.
Elders has filed a lawsuit against four former employees who defected to Ruralco, accusing them of poaching clients and misusing confidential information. The company is seeking to enforce non-compete clauses to prevent further damage.
The defection could have a catastrophic impact on Elders' subsidiary, Elders Rural Services Australia (ERSAL), potentially leading to a 15% loss of its total business if non-compete clauses are not enforced.
Elders has foreshadowed an underlying loss of between $32 million and $39 million for the full year, partly due to the disruption caused by the traders' defection and the potential loss of key clients.
Elders has taken legal action to stop the traders from poaching clients and to ensure the return of confidential information. The company is also investigating discrepancies in cattle valuations with the help of forensic accountants.
The non-compete clauses are crucial for Elders as they prevent the defected traders from soliciting Elders' clients for a specified period, helping to protect the company's business interests during this challenging time.
The defection has raised concerns among Elders' customers about the company's ability to fulfill contractual obligations. Notably, Indonesia's TUM, a major customer, is considering alternative suppliers for live cattle.
The legal proceedings are ongoing, with a trial set for November 25. In the meantime, the court has ordered the defected traders not to approach former Elders clients, and Elders is working to enforce the non-compete clauses.