DJs protects margins at cost of sales
A decision to pull back on its discounting and promotional activities, despite an avalanche of sales from its competitors and other merchandise retailers such as Target, had cost it sales but protected margins.
Total sales for David Jones slipped 1.3 per cent to $449.8 million for the fourth quarter, slightly better than the 2.2 per cent slide in the third quarter and a 1.4 per cent dip in the second quarter.
The last time David Jones recorded positive sales momentum was nine months ago, and chief executive Paul Zahra on Thursday did not hold much hope out for a change to the tough trading conditions even after the distraction of the election disappeared next week.
"While this will ensure we are well placed to capitalise on any strengthening in consumer sentiment as it occurs, we expect that over the next 12 months trading conditions will remain challenging," Mr Zahra said..
"With consumer sentiment as weak as it is we think it will be tough, we have planned the business that way."
Mr Zahra said during the fourth quarter David Jones had focused on reducing the depth and breadth of its discounting events, cutting the duration of sales by a third, and instead delivering better full margin sales.
"I am pleased to report that following 15 months of reducing the depth and breadth of our discounting, we believe we now have a promotional program which reflects the right mix of discounting versus full margin sales periods."
This had hurt actual sales revenue however. For the fourth quarter like-for-like sales, stripping out the impact of new store openings, were down 2.9 per cent. Full-year sales for fiscal 2013 were down 1.2 per cent to $1.85 billion, or down 1.8 per cent on a like-for-like basis.
Mr Zahra said the high margin womenswear, beauty and accessories had generated sales growth in the fourth quarter but it was not enough to counter a continued slide in its home categories, particularly electronics, and a flat performance in men's and children's wear.
Swimwear had its best fourth quarter in the company's history, underlining the impact the warm winter was having on shoppers and their spending habits.
David Jones was continuing to lower its exposure to poor performing categories and was moving out of DVDs and other home entertainment products. A deal with Dick Smith to hand over the day-to-day running of its underperforming electronics category would not be significant to 2014 earnings.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
David Jones cut back on discounting and shortened the duration of sales by about a third to protect margins, which improved full‑price sales but reduced overall sales revenue — total sales fell 1.3% in the fourth quarter to $449.8 million and like‑for‑like sales were down 2.9% for the quarter.
For fiscal 2013 David Jones' full‑year sales were down 1.2% to $1.85 billion, and on a like‑for‑like basis sales fell 1.8% compared with the prior year.
High‑margin categories such as womenswear, beauty and accessories generated sales growth in the fourth quarter, while home categories — especially electronics — continued to slide; men's and children's wear were broadly flat.
A balmy winter led to unexpectedly strong swimwear sales — the best fourth quarter for swimwear in the retailer's history — underlining how weather shifted customer spending away from some traditional winter categories.
David Jones is lowering exposure to poor‑performing categories by exiting DVDs and other home entertainment lines and plans to hand day‑to‑day running of its underperforming electronics category to Dick Smith.
According to the company, the arrangement with Dick Smith to run the electronics category would not be significant to 2014 earnings.
CEO Paul Zahra said consumer sentiment is weak and he expects trading conditions to remain challenging over the next 12 months, though the company has planned the business to be positioned to capitalise if sentiment strengthens.
While other retailers such as Target and competitors ran heavy promotional activity that drove a lot of sales, David Jones deliberately pulled back from deep discounting to protect margins, which cost the business sales volume even as it preserved profitability.