Coming after the mining boom: a leap of faith
Seriously. As it happens, the man at the top of the Bank is a man of faith. A parishioner at his local Baptist church, Glenn Stevens believes he works for the bloke upstairs.
"I definitely think if you are a Christian, God has given you certain capabilities to do a job, to earn a living, and the Bible teaches that you should do that as if you were doing it for him," he told an Easter breakfast a few years back.
But faith doesn't always get you what you want. If it did, it wouldn't be faith.
That's why Stevens is hanging on to Plan B and preparing to use it.
His problem is that the resources construction boom is about to peak.
When Chris Richardson of Deloitte Access had the temerity to suggest this a year ago in the midst of mining euphoria (and very bullish budget forecasts), he was rubbished. But then the resources minister started saying the same thing.
Months later BHP Billiton postponed indefinitely the $30 billion Olympic Dam uranium and coal project, Fortescue scaled backed an iron ore investment program already under way, and on Friday this week Woodside Petroleum shelved its $40 billion Browse liquefied natural gas project.
What's left is almost unimaginably big. The Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics says projects worth $268 billion are already locked in. An astounding $195 billion are gas or petroleum projects.
"To put this in perspective, and to show the scale of the pipeline in Australia, the total committed expenditure on Australia's oil and gas projects is comparable to the total cost of the Apollo moon program in 2012 prices," it says in its latest update.
But new projects aren't getting ticks. This means that, as big as it is, Australia's resources construction boom will soon turn down.
In some ways, this will be a good thing. It's been hard to find workers to build the national broadband network.
But the boom has made construction a major employer in its own right. In the 10 years since the resources boom began, the construction industry has taken on 300,000 workers. Manufacturing has lost 123,000. Construction is now a bigger employer than manufacturing, and a much bigger employer than mining.
A downturn in resources investment will very quickly swell unemployment. (Unless a lot of smaller projects come along or a huge project such as a decision to go full throttle on the national broadband network or build the very fast train.)
It will mean an economic slump, something the Reserve Bank is charged with avoiding.
"The peak in resources investment is now close" was how Reserve Bank assistant governor Christopher Kent put his official assessment in an address to the Bloomberg Economic Summit this week.
"Once it has passed, the decline in mining investment - and the effect of the still high level of the exchange rate and ongoing fiscal consolidation - will weigh on economic growth."
His point is that when mine construction turns down, it would be nice if the Australian dollar turned down so that manufacturers and others found it worthwhile to expand and take on the displaced workers.
It would be nice too if the government expanded construction (as it did during the global financial crisis).
But the dollar isn't turning down. International currency wars and the extraordinary popularity of Australia as a place for financial investment kept it high even when resources prices turned down late last year. It is staying high now that resource prices have turned back up.
And far from expanding, government work is vanishing as the Feds try to reign in the deficit and the states find themselves short of funds. (The national broadband network, off-budget with the connivance of both sides of politics, is the one big exception.)
So it helps to have faith that something will come along - anything - to pick up the slack.
"This provides scope for other sources of demand to pick up," was how Kent put it in his speech Wednesday.
What are the grounds for faith?
Kent doesn't identify many.
One is that the peak in mining investment should be more like a plateau than a cliff. "So there's not as much to fill, if you take that into consideration."
Planned non-mining business investment is "sort of subdued is how I would characterise it this financial year; but then gradually picks up next financial year".
Housing investment "picked up over the second half of 2012, with further moderate growth expected" in response to lower interest rates. This should in time provide "a measure of support to employment and activity in the non-mining business sector", he says, using words chosen to indicate that while it'll be something, it may not be enough.
Also, lower interest rates have boosted consumer confidence. "This doesn't mean that consumption growth will return to the very strong pace seen prior to the financial crisis, but it is consistent with consumption growing at least in line with incomes and at a stronger pace than was observed towards the end of last year," Kent says. "Indeed, the stronger retail sales data since the beginning of the year support this outlook."
In time, higher consumer spending should boost business investment. But not straight away. "Firms can respond to a pick-up in demand first by making use of spare capacity they may have," Kent says.
Non-mining businesses certainly have the means to expand. For most, the cost of borrowing is low. And while the high dollar makes it hard for them to compete with suppliers overseas, it makes it easy for them to import.
But if you walked away from Kent's speech thinking the non mining economy is certain to pick up the slack when the resource investment boom peaks, you were alone. That's why Kent and Stevens need faith, and Plan B.
Ross Gittins is on leave.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
The article says the resources construction boom has reached a very large scale but is running out of new projects. The Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics reports about $268 billion of projects already committed (including $195 billion in gas and petroleum), yet few new projects are getting approved. That means overall resources construction spending is likely to level off or decline from its peak.
Reserve Bank officials are preparing for a slowdown in mining investment and have Plan B — using lower interest rates to support the economy. The article explains the RBA is more likely to cut rates than raise them if the decline in resource investment weighs on growth, because monetary easing is the tool the Bank can use to try to avoid an economic slump.
The article highlights several major project changes: BHP Billiton postponed its $30 billion Olympic Dam uranium and coal project indefinitely, Fortescue scaled back an iron‑ore investment program, and Woodside Petroleum shelved its $40 billion Browse liquefied natural gas project. These moves are cited as evidence that new large projects are becoming less certain.
A downturn would quickly add to unemployment because construction became a major employer during the boom—taking on about 300,000 workers over ten years—while manufacturing has lost workers. The article warns that unless many smaller projects arrive or there is major public construction, displaced workers from mine construction could swell unemployment.
In theory yes: the article notes the Reserve Bank hopes a falling dollar would help manufacturers and others expand and take on displaced workers. But it also points out the dollar wasn't turning down at the time because international currency moves and Australia’s popularity for financial investment were keeping it high, so that offset may not be forthcoming.
The article identifies a few potential offsets: housing investment has picked up in response to lower interest rates and could moderately grow, consumer confidence and retail sales have improved with lower rates, and non‑mining business investment is subdued now but could gradually pick up next financial year. However, those sources may not be large enough immediately to fully replace mining investment.
A high Australian dollar makes it harder for non‑mining businesses to compete with overseas suppliers, which can discourage expansion and investment. At the same time, it makes importing easier and borrowing costs are low, so firms have the means to expand—but the exchange rate remains a headwind for export‑facing industries.
Everyday investors should know that a peak in mining construction can slow national economic growth, raise unemployment in construction‑linked areas, and place pressure on sectors like manufacturing. The Reserve Bank is likely to respond by cutting interest rates to support demand, and modest recoveries in housing and consumer spending could help over time—but the article stresses these offsets are uncertain, so the transition may be bumpy.

