InvestSMART

CBD

Tinkler haunting presence for Whitehaven
By · 2 Nov 2012
By ·
2 Nov 2012
comments Comments
Upsell Banner
Tinkler haunting presence for Whitehaven

NATHAN Tinkler was not at Whitehaven Coal's annual meeting in Sydney but he dominated proceedings he was the elephant not in the room.

It seems Singapore, where the highly geared former electrician lives, wasn't far enough away for two Whitehaven directors, Paul Flynn and Philip Christensen, who had been nominated to the board by Tinkler but were now desperate to distance themselves from their former employer and stand as full independents.

Whitehaven likes to let director candidates speak to shareholders and take questions from the floor. Which left room for Australian Shareholders Association representative Stephen Mayne to ask when did you stop being a Tinkler representative? Why?

Flynn tried stonewalling: he had known Tinkler for many years, they had "some different views", there was a "parting of the ways", it was a "natural thing" that concluded at the end of September.

Both Flynn and Christensen were terminated when Tinkler's company Aston Resources shut its office ahead of the merger with Whitehaven, and there had been minimal contact with Tinkler since.

Awkwardly, Mayne asked Christensen whether Tinkler had paid all his entitlements in full.

"I'd prefer not to answer that as I think the chairman said we could talk to you about that after this meeting but I don't think it's productive here," Christensen said.

Another: "Why has Mr Tinkler said about you, and not Paul, that you are 'like a piece of gum on the bottom of my shoe'?"

To which Christensen said: "I suggest you ask Mr Tinkler that."

Chairman Mark Vaile was also haunted by the ghost of Tinkler, forced to defend his own relationship and history with the angry absentee. "Do I feel embarrassment, or silly? No," said the former deputy prime minister, who pointed out he had "always enjoyed question time".

Joyce faces flak

A $5.57 million pay packet kept Qantas chief executive Alan Joyce flying high this year, unlike the passengers he grounded a year ago during a stoush with unions.

But it looks like the chief pilot is going to hit some turbulence at the airline's annual meeting.

While institutional advisers ISS and CGI Glass Lewis have advised their big-end-of-town clients to hold their noses and vote for the remuneration report, the Australian Shareholders Association is voting its proxies against.

ASA chief executive Vas Kolesnikoff told CBD there were problems with Joyce's performance rights and the structure of his long-term benefits.

"The bigger point is that if you look at Qantas over the past five years it's been a serial underperformer, and there doesn't appear to be much light at the end of the tunnel," he said.

He said the ASA objected to the Flying Kangaroo's habit of basing executive remuneration on underlying profit, a measure "that bears no resemblance to the statutory profit based on accounting standards".

An underlying profit of $95 million somehow became a statutory loss of $244 million its first since it was privatised 17 years ago. "Qantas is just a classic case for every year they find a new reason to exclude a bunch of payments from their underlying profit," Kolesnikoff said. "We see that as being a bad measure."

Kohler sails ahead

IT MUST be confusing being Alan Kohler. At a time in history when most men have abandoned headwear, the finance guru's bonce is in turn occupied by one or the other of his two hats: as a presenter on the taxpayer-funded ABC or as mini media magnate through the Business Spectator group he runs for Uncle Rupert Murdoch.

In the past week or so Kohler has seemingly added another hat to his collection, running a campaign bagging Australia's super industry through News Ltd papers and his websites. The articles, which make entirely legitimate points about the high fees and poor performance of Aussie super, point to the Save Our Super website. There, readers can buy a guide on how to set up their own self-managed superannuation fund for just $12.95.

And on Wednesday, one of Kohler's Business Spectator super industry yarns also popped up on the ABC's Drum website, with a link leading to his tipsheet Eureka Report (subscription $435 a year).

The ABC and Kohler say this is not a conflict of interest. He told CBD it was not an extra hat at all.

"As agreed with the ABC, the piece that they get for the Drum is the same as I write for Business Spectator and always has been, so that's been going on for probably a couple of years now," he said.

"It has for a couple of years had who I have and what I do at the bottom, with the link through to Business Spectator and Eureka Report. It didn't talk about the Save Our Super campaign, it didn't direct anyone to that website."

An ABC spokeswoman said: "In this instance there was no breach of the arrangement we have had in place with Alan Kohler over many years."

At least one subject of the Murdoch imperium thinks Kohler has a conflict of interest, even if it is one that is "just great for us in the News Ltd family" and " free advertising on your ABC".

That would be Herald Sun columnist Terry McCrann, who in June wrote "it is completely unacceptable for him [Kohler] to be the driver and the face of ABC-TV's business coverage".

Kohler told CBD: "He wrote that, I disagree with that."

Got a tip?

bbutler@fairfaxmedia.com.au

Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.