Billabong stranded by a change of tide
Australia's "big three" - Rip Curl, Quiksilver and Billabong - had all experienced shrinking sales and expanding debts in recent years as consumers turned their backs on expensive surf-branded apparel, favouring high-fashion cum high-street trends and the cheaper convenience of online shopping.
"Billabong is an iconic Australian brand, but it isn't high fashion and it never has been," said Josh Flinn, a fashion commentator and stylist with Australia's Next Top Model.
"Until recently, the Western world considered surfwear Australia's only contribution to global fashion, and it's only really been in the last few seasons, with Dion Lee, Collette Dinnigan, and Alex Perry being sold overseas, that Australian design is starting to get attention."
With attention, however, comes an influx of overseas brands, power fashion houses and glitzy flagship stores where consumers are able to replicate global trends without spending a fortune.
"It's a sad state of affairs, but it's happening to so many local brands, not just Billabong," Flinn said. "How can labels possibly compete when major fashion houses are introducing flagship stores from overseas, and their prices are more affordable?"
Harper's Bazaar fashion director Thelma McQuillan said Billabong just wasn't on the fashion radar: you only had to pay a visit to Bondi to see what young women were wearing to the beach, and it wasn't surfwear. Instead, they were inclined to high-waisted denim cut-offs and labels such as Zimmermann and Sass & Bide.
Flinn said it was not clear who Billabong was targeting, the chain having missed or perhaps underestimated the "hipster" movement. It wasn't competing with quality swimwear brands, either. Swimwear had taken a high-fashion route, with labels such as Seafolly, Camilla and Marc and Zimmermann selling striking designs for a similar price.
"Meanwhile, online companies like Asos make fashion affordable for young buyers," he said. "Billabong seems to be flailing in the middle, missing trend, but not cheap either."
Rip Curl, however, was maintaining its affiliation with "old school" surfing, which had provided a slight buffer for the brand, while fellow surf label Mambo had branched into children's wear.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
According to fashion commentators in the article, Billabong struggled because the brand failed to remain current with shifting fashion trends. It missed or underestimated movements like the 'hipster' trend, wasn't perceived as high fashion, and ended up 'flailing in the middle'—not trendy enough for fashion-conscious buyers and not cheap enough to compete with fast-fashion or online retailers.
The article says consumers moved away from expensive surf-branded apparel toward high-fashion/high-street trends and the convenience and lower prices of online shopping. As a result, Australia’s 'big three'—Rip Curl, Quiksilver and Billabong—experienced shrinking sales and expanding debts in recent years.
Online companies such as ASOS made fashion more affordable for young buyers, the article notes, undercutting mid-market surf brands. That accessibility helped attract price-sensitive consumers away from traditional surf labels, increasing competitive pressure on brands like Billabong.
No. Harper's Bazaar fashion director Thelma McQuillan said Billabong 'just wasn't on the fashion radar'—for example, young women at Bondi were wearing high‑waisted denim cut-offs and labels like Zimmermann and Sass & Bide rather than surfwear.
The article notes Rip Curl maintained its affiliation with 'old school' surfing, which provided some buffer for the brand, while Mambo diversified by branching into children's wear. Swimwear as a category moved toward higher-fashion offerings from brands such as Seafolly, Camilla and Marc, and Zimmermann.
Yes. Increased attention for Australian design (names like Dion Lee, Collette Dinnigan and Alex Perry) coincided with an influx of overseas brands, power fashion houses and flagship stores. These entrants allowed consumers to replicate global trends often at more affordable prices, squeezing local surf labels.
The article mentions private equity 'surfed in on Billabong' as the brand faced decline, indicating outside investment interest amid the company’s struggles—though it emphasizes commentators focused on why Billabong had headed toward a wipeout rather than deal specifics.
The article highlights that changing consumer tastes and competitive shifts (fast fashion, online retail, international brands) can quickly alter a retail brand’s prospects. For investors, this underscores the importance of assessing a retailer’s ability to stay current with trends, compete on price or niche positioning, and adapt product or distribution strategies.
Call 1300 880 160
Start a chat
Schedule a call
