Billabong stranded by a change of tide
Australia's "big three" - Rip Curl, Quiksilver and Billabong - had all experienced shrinking sales and expanding debts in recent years as consumers turned their backs on expensive surf-branded apparel, favouring high-fashion cum high-street trends and the cheaper convenience of online shopping.
"Billabong is an iconic Australian brand, but it isn't high fashion and it never has been," said Josh Flinn, a fashion commentator and stylist with Australia's Next Top Model.
"Until recently, the Western world considered surfwear Australia's only contribution to global fashion, and it's only really been in the last few seasons, with Dion Lee, Collette Dinnigan, and Alex Perry being sold overseas, that Australian design is starting to get attention."
With attention, however, comes an influx of overseas brands, power fashion houses and glitzy flagship stores where consumers are able to replicate global trends without spending a fortune.
"It's a sad state of affairs, but it's happening to so many local brands, not just Billabong," Flinn said. "How can labels possibly compete when major fashion houses are introducing flagship stores from overseas, and their prices are more affordable?"
Harper's Bazaar fashion director Thelma McQuillan said Billabong just wasn't on the fashion radar: you only had to pay a visit to Bondi to see what young women were wearing to the beach, and it wasn't surfwear. Instead, they were inclined to high-waisted denim cut-offs and labels such as Zimmermann and Sass & Bide.
Flinn said it was not clear who Billabong was targeting, the chain having missed or perhaps underestimated the "hipster" movement. It wasn't competing with quality swimwear brands, either. Swimwear had taken a high-fashion route, with labels such as Seafolly, Camilla and Marc and Zimmermann selling striking designs for a similar price.
"Meanwhile, online companies like Asos make fashion affordable for young buyers," he said. "Billabong seems to be flailing in the middle, missing trend, but not cheap either."
Rip Curl, however, was maintaining its affiliation with "old school" surfing, which had provided a slight buffer for the brand, while fellow surf label Mambo had branched into children's wear.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
According to the article, Billabong struggled because the brand failed to remain current with fashion trends. Commentators said it missed movements like the "hipster" look, wasn't positioned as high fashion, and ended up "flailing in the middle" — neither trendy nor cheap enough to compete effectively.
The article explains that consumers shifted to cheaper, convenient online options and had greater access to overseas brands and flagship stores. That made it easier for shoppers to replicate global trends affordably, putting pressure on local surfwear chains' sales and market share.
Yes — the article notes Rip Curl retained its association with "old school" surfing, which provided a buffer for the brand, while Mambo diversified into children's wear. Those clearer positioning choices helped them weather changing consumer tastes better than Billabong.
High-fashion swimwear labels such as Seafolly, Camilla and Marc, and Zimmermann moved into striking designs at similar price points. That meant consumers seeking fashionable swimwear often chose these brands over mainstream surfwear, squeezing Billabong's swim segment.
The article says private equity "surfed in on Billabong" while industry figures highlighted why the chain was heading for a wipeout. In other words, private equity investors moved into the situation as the brand faced major strategic and sales challenges.
Fashion commentary in the article observed that young women at Bondi were wearing high-waisted denim cut-offs and labels such as Zimmermann and Sass & Bide, rather than traditional surfwear — showing a shift toward high-fashion and high-street looks.
"Flailing in the middle" refers to Billabong missing current trends while not being a low-cost option. For everyday investors, the takeaway is that unclear brand positioning and strong competition from online and high-fashion rivals can be a material risk to retail earnings and long-term brand value.
The article suggests some brands adapted better: Rip Curl leaned into authentic surf heritage and Mambo expanded into children's wear. It also implies that brands that either embrace high-fashion swimwear or offer affordable online options (like Asos does) are better placed to meet changing consumer demand.
Call 1300 880 160
Start a chat
Schedule a call
