InvestSMART

BHP Billiton keen on selling new image but investors yet to buy it

A quest for innovation can produce great prizes, of which BHP Billiton is keenly aware.
By · 26 Aug 2011
By ·
26 Aug 2011
comments Comments
A quest for innovation can produce great prizes, of which BHP Billiton is keenly aware.

TWO of the world's top 10 companies, BHP Billiton and Apple, delivered big announcements this week. The resource giant produced a staggering $US23.6 billion ($A22.50 billion) profit and Apple said its founder and mastermind, Steve Jobs, would be stepping down as chief executive.

The companies deserve their spots on the market capitalisation ladder, but they have nothing in common, other than what they produce is in high demand. Where they sit on this league table in, say, five years will be testament to their ability to read their markets. The immediate response to the resignation of Jobs was a more than 5 per cent fall in the Apple share price this despite people waiting for this shoe to drop for a year. The success of Apple has been a story of innovation and marketing that is without peer products that sometimes copied, usually refined but always captured the imagination of the consumer.

The sustained earnings growth from a company that relied on innovation is in itself highly unusual. But it was this constant improvement that earned it a valuation to put it at No. 2 in the world measured by market capitalisation.

BHP Billiton, by contrast, is not a company that has needed to reinvent the wheel. But over the past five years it has been blessed by having mineral resources that are in acute demand from a number of developing economies, including China. For the most part the booming profit growth that BHP Billiton is experiencing is built on legacy assets built over decades. The growth in demand for these resources has not yet been matched by supply and in some sectors such as iron ore and coal this may not happen for another five or 10 years. The major investment in supply has been a relatively recent occurrence.

BHP and arch rival Rio Tinto have now engaged in large-scale capital expenditure to boost supply but it will be a few years before this comes on stream. BHP took advantage of a conservative balance sheet to continue investment during the global financial crisis but has since stepped this up. Thus the bulk of BHP's bloated cash flow comes from improved prices for its products rather than much of an increase in the volumes sold.

The issue for BHP is that the price-earnings ratio on which it trades does not reflect a market view that this great fortune can go on without risk. Investors are concerned that if China's growth falters, the company might also deflate. BHP argues that it now has a more reliable source of income, given that its portfolio of commodities is more diverse. It wants to market itself as an industrial company dressed in a commodity company's clothing. And here is why. Iron ore made up 68 per cent of Rio's earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation for BHP it made up just 37.5 per cent.

The company says the linear nature of its dividends they are stable or increase is evidence of its earnings sustainability. That it continues to invest during the cycle further backs up this position. BHP also employs some degree of capital management and has bought back shares. All strategies are used to iron out the cyclicality of a typical commodity business. BHP takes the view that China will become less reliant on export earnings as demand from its middle-class continues to pick up, and that this will be aided by breaking the long-held pattern of excessive saving as middle-class welfare systems such as healthcare and superannuation emerge.

China's current phase requires raw materials such as iron ore and coal to make steel, and this will move into demand for middle-class products such as whitegoods. As Asian and Latin American economies continue to develop, so will their requirements for energy and protein. The BHP map involves investing across these assets to accommodate each new stage.

It's fair to say that despite the grand plan to put capital into counter-cyclical investments, BHP is viewed as a stock whose massive returns are the result of the high prices it now receives, primarily for its iron ore. The company's share price fall from more than $49 four months ago to yesterday's close of $38.61 suggests the market is responding to fears that BHP remains hostage to the fortunes of the skittish broader international economy.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

The article reports BHP Billiton produced a staggering US$23.6 billion (A$22.50 billion) profit, highlighting the company’s strong recent earnings.

According to the article, Apple’s share price fell by more than 5% immediately after Steve Jobs announced he would step down as chief executive, even though many investors had expected the move for about a year.

The article contrasts Apple’s sustained earnings from continuous product innovation and marketing with BHP’s fortunes, which have been driven mainly by high global demand for legacy mineral assets (especially from developing economies like China) rather than repeated product reinvention.

Investors worry that BHP’s strong returns are tied to high commodity prices and demand—particularly from China—so if China’s growth falters the company could be hit. The article notes the price‑earnings ratio doesn’t reflect a belief the current windfall is risk‑free.

The article states iron ore made up 68% of Rio Tinto’s earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), while for BHP it accounted for just 37.5%, showing BHP is less concentrated in iron ore than Rio.

The article points out that most of BHP’s recent ‘bloated’ cash flow comes from improved prices for its products rather than a significant increase in the volumes sold.

Yes. The article says BHP wants to market itself as an industrial company rather than just a commodity company, citing a more diverse commodity portfolio, a track record of stable-or-rising dividends, continued investment through the cycle, and share buybacks as evidence of earnings sustainability and capital management.

The article explains BHP and rival Rio Tinto have engaged in large‑scale capital expenditure to increase supply, but it will be a few years before that new capacity comes on stream; the investment effort only recently stepped up after the global financial crisis period.