Australia may miss gas rewards
The shift is expected as newer exporters, principally in north America, enter the market offering cheaper gas. Also, the blowout in the cost to develop export projects in Western Australia has undermined the competitiveness of local exporters, which will leave more projects only marginally viable.
Australia is becoming the world's largest exporter of liquefied natural gas. It is on track to surpass Qatar's 90 million tonnes of annual shipments as a slew of projects in Queensland, the Northern Territory and Western Australia come on stream.
Of the expected 65 million tonnes of potential demand in Asia over the next several years, the underlying level of "free demand" is likely to be about 40 million tonnes, said David Hewitt, Credit Suisse's co-head of oil and gas research, and a former gas marketer.
Australia will compete with Canada, the US and East Africa to supply this gas, he said. "The buyers always want to diversify their portfolio of supply ... it's a security of supply question, and it's an attempt to dilute seller concentration. For that reason, the Asian buyers are not going to allocate all of that 40 million tonnes ... to Australasia [Australia and PNG].
"At best, Australasia could compete for 10 million tonnes ... In simple terms, we've done our dash."
Asian buyers such as Japan and India have become increasingly vocal about the Asian price of gas imports of $US13-$US16 per mmBtu (million British thermal units), which is significantly higher than the European price of about $US7-$US10 per mmBtu.
The domestic US price is about $US4 ($4.27), to which needs to be added processing, shipping and related costs. That would push the price closer to $US10 per mmBtu.
Even so, Mr Hewitt said the premium of about $US4 per mmBtu paid in Asia could decline, but it would not disappear. He reckoned it would halve to about $US2 over the next decade or so.
So far this year, the US has approved four export gas projects to supply non-free trade agreement countries. Additionally, on Canada's west coast, a further round of projects are trying to get off the ground. British Gas is also working on a 1 million tonne a year project, Prince Rupert.
Mr Hewitt also cautioned over the future of floating LNG, given the infancy of this technology. Woodside and ExxonMobil have signalled they will use the technology for the Browse and Scarborough projects off Western Australia, although Mr Hewitt said Exxon would be "very disciplined in its development in what is a step-out of a step-out technology".
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
Yes. The article says Australia is becoming the world’s largest exporter of liquefied natural gas, on track to surpass Qatar’s 90 million tonnes of annual shipments as a slew of projects in Queensland, the Northern Territory and Western Australia come on stream.
Credit Suisse analyst David Hewitt estimates about 65 million tonnes of potential demand in Asia, but only around 40 million tonnes of underlying “free demand.” Hewitt suggested Australasia (Australia and PNG) might realistically compete for roughly 10 million tonnes of that demand because Asian buyers will diversify suppliers.
The article notes newer exporters, principally in North America, are entering the market with cheaper gas. The US has approved multiple export projects and Canada has projects proposed on its west coast. This increased supply competition is likely to limit the share and pricing power available to Australian exporters.
According to the article, Asian import prices are about US$13–US$16 per mmBtu, European prices are roughly US$7–US$10 per mmBtu, and the domestic US price is around US$4 per mmBtu. After adding processing, shipping and other costs, US-sourced gas to Asia could sit closer to US$10 per mmBtu.
No — the article reports David Hewitt expects the Asian premium (about US$4 per mmBtu at the time) to decline but not disappear, possibly halving to around US$2 per mmBtu over the next decade or so.
The article states a blowout in the cost to develop export projects in Western Australia has undermined the competitiveness of local exporters, leaving more projects only marginally viable.
Floating LNG is a newer technology for liquefying gas offshore. The article highlights that FLNG is still in its infancy and David Hewitt cautioned about its future. Woodside and ExxonMobil plan to use FLNG for the Browse and Scarborough projects, though the article says Exxon is likely to be disciplined in progressing this step‑out technology.
Based on the article, investors should watch competition from new exporters (US, Canada, East Africa), the size of Asia’s “free demand,” price spreads between Asia/Europe/US, project development costs (especially in Western Australia), approvals and progress on export projects, and technology risk for FLNG. These factors will influence revenues and the viability of new Australian LNG projects.

