Auction rates signal boom at hand
Auction clearance rates in Sydney are near record highs, hovering around 80 per cent all year while Melbourne's last week hit 75 per cent. Clearance rates of 85 per cent signal an overheated market, property pundits say, and 70 to 80 per cent is strong.
There is disagreement in the industry about whether Australia is about to experience another run on property, similar to the peak of 2010, or not.
But Bell Potter Securities' Charlie Aitken - an influential analyst - believes the settings are in place for a "genuine residential property boom", assuming Australia's currently historically low interest rates remain at low levels for the next few years.
That means savers will begin to realise they are making negative returns on deposits, and will begin to rotate money back into property and shares in increasing numbers.
This "great rotation" could accelerate following a "decisive federal election result", which will deliver a much-needed boost to confidence.
"Australian savers will receive negative real returns on cash for an extended period," Mr Aitken wrote. "Australian borrowers will be able to borrow, secured against residential property, at 2.5 to 3 per cent real. These are real interest rates, for deposits and borrowing, that no Australian has ever experienced."
The real estate industry has been debating for weeks about whether property markets in Sydney and Melbourne are showing signs of overheating.
"We could be in a bubble but we won't know for sure until the end of the year," Reece Theedam, from Sydney's Haus Real Estate, said.
But all the talk of overheating markets, bubbles and booms is starting to put people off, Mr Theedam said.
"In the past two weeks because the media are saying the market's too hot, people are saying 'let's wait a bit'," Mr Theedam said.
"Are we in a boom? It's very hard to say. We are definitely at the start of the incline. It's been very hard to pick the market since the global financial crisis. I don't think we've had a normal market since 2007."
Fletcher's Tim Heavyside, who auctioned five Melbourne properties at the weekend, said "we are in a boom, definitely - in Melbourne's eastern suburbs, anyway".
But others are not so sure.
Buyer advocate Frank Valentic said he would need to see clearance rates consistently above 85 per cent before he'd call a boom.
"But we are on the upside. We are just back where we were in 2010," Mr Valentic said.
But economists say another property boom would cement differences in wealth because first home buyers face too many obstacles to enter the market, and those who might want to trade up are still trying to pay down debt.
That means the boom would be driven by investors who typically invest in existing dwellings, rather than new homes.
"An investor-driven recovery is much more likely to put upward pressure on prices and is less likely to induce new dwelling supply, which is the opposite of what the Reserve Bank wants, and what the country needs," Saul Eslake, chief economist of Bank of America Merrill Lynch, said.
"If [this particular forecast] is right then I think that would be a very regrettable development from a social point of view."
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
High auction clearance rates—Sydney hovering around 80% all year and Melbourne recently hitting about 75%—signal strong buyer demand. Property commentators say 70–80% is a strong market and rates above about 85% are seen as overheating. For investors, rising clearance rates typically mean faster sales and upward price pressure, but they can also raise the risk of a market that becomes overheated.
Experts are divided. Some agents, like Tim Heavyside in Melbourne's eastern suburbs, say the market is already in a boom, while buyer advocates such as Frank Valentic say they'd want to see clearance rates consistently above 85% before calling it a boom. Reece Theedam cautions we may not know for sure until later in the year. So the article shows a mix of bullish and cautious views rather than a consensus.
It's possible but not certain. Bell Potter analyst Charlie Aitken believes the conditions are in place for a 'genuine residential property boom' if historically low interest rates stay low for a few years. Others point out we're only back to levels similar to 2010 and remain cautious. The industry is debating whether we'll see a repeat of the 2010 peak.
According to Charlie Aitken in the article, prolonged low interest rates would mean savers face negative real returns on cash, which could push them to rotate money into property and shares. At the same time, borrowers could effectively borrow against residential property at very low real rates (Aitken mentioned 2.5–3% real), which could further support property demand and prices.
The 'great rotation' described by Charlie Aitken is the idea that savers, facing negative real returns on deposits, will shift funds into risk assets such as property and shares. The article suggests this rotation could accelerate after a decisive federal election result that boosts confidence, potentially increasing demand for housing and stocks.
Economists quoted in the article warn that another boom could cement wealth differences. First-home buyers face significant barriers to entering the market, while those able to invest—typically in existing dwellings—would benefit from price rises. That investor-driven growth is less likely to generate new housing supply, which could worsen affordability and inequality.
Saul Eslake in the article explains that an investor-driven recovery tends to push prices up without encouraging new dwelling supply. That contrasts with a recovery driven by owner-occupiers and new construction, which would help ease shortages. An investor-led boom could therefore increase price pressure and do little to increase the homes available that the Reserve Bank and the country need.
The article notes media coverage about overheating can influence buyer sentiment: Reece Theedam says media talk about the market being 'too hot' has made some potential buyers pause and 'wait a bit.' That means media narratives can slow activity even in a rising market. For everyday investors, the article suggests being aware of both market data (like clearance rates) and sentiment, but it does not provide specific buy/sell advice.

