HIGH-frequency traders had nothing to do with a price spike on the Australian Securities Exchange in October, the corporate regulator says, but market manipulation has not been ruled out.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission released an update on Tuesday of its inquiry into a series of unusual transactions on the ASX on October 18. The share prices of more than eight blue-chip stocks - including ANZ, Commonwealth Bank, Brambles, AGL, Bank of Queensland, Ansell and Aristocrat - surged seconds after trading began at 10am.
The series of unusual transactions raised the spectre of market manipulation and called into question the integrity of trading on the ASX, after a trade worth $200 million was revised down to just $56 million seconds before the market opened.
"ASIC has ruled out a dysfunctional algorithm or high-frequency trading strategies as the cause of the spike," its market update said.
"ASIC has spoken with the market participant and the ASX, to obtain information regarding the cause of the trading spike. Interviews were conducted the day following the incident with the parties involved in the transactions, including the client."
The regulator found that the questionable orders were placed through the same broker - believed to be UBS on behalf of an overseas client - but neither is named by ASIC.
A spokeswoman for UBS said on Tuesday the company would "not be making any comment at this stage".
ASIC said its inquiry had found that large volume orders to sell securities in the opening auction on the ASX were placed through a single broker.
But immediately before the beginning of the daily opening auction, there was a reduction in the volumes of those sell orders for securities trading in the A-B rotation of the auction (in companies with names beginning with letters A and B).
"This late reduction in volumes caused several securities to trade in the auction at significantly higher prices relative to the previous day's close," the update said.
The larger order inflated the ASX opening price and the value of exchange-traded funds based on the ASX 200 index, listed as XJO.
The ASX 200 Futures Index reached 4606 on October 18, rising above 4600 for the first time since the global financial crisis.
The $144 million change caught the market napping, and some share prices fluctuated wildly.
The mystery trades in ANZ pushed the share price up by $1.67, or 6.5 per cent, when trading began at 10am. The stock soared to $27.63 on the opening bell, before falling to $25.79 when the market closed.
ASIC said it would continue to investigate the matter.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
What were the mystery trades on the ASX on October 18 and why did they matter?
On October 18 a series of unusual transactions caused share prices of more than eight blue‑chip stocks to surge seconds after trading began at 10am. A trade that had been reported as $200 million was revised to $56 million seconds before the market opened, creating about a $144 million change and sparking questions about market integrity. The corporate regulator, ASIC, launched an inquiry because the opening‑auction distortions affected individual share prices and the value of ASX 200‑based ETFs.
Which companies and ETFs were hit by the ASX opening price spike?
The article named several affected blue‑chip stocks, including ANZ, Commonwealth Bank, Brambles, AGL, Bank of Queensland, Ansell and Aristocrat. The spike also inflated the opening price of securities used to calculate ASX 200 exchange‑traded funds listed as XJO, and the ASX 200 Futures Index briefly rose above 4600.
Did high‑frequency trading or a broken algorithm cause the ASX price spike?
ASIC said it has ruled out a dysfunctional algorithm or high‑frequency trading strategies as the cause of the spike. However, the regulator has not ruled out market manipulation and continues its inquiry.
How did orders in the ASX opening auction cause prices to jump?
ASIC found large volume sell orders for the opening auction were placed through a single broker, and then volumes of those sell orders were reduced immediately before the start of the auction for securities in the A‑B rotation. That late reduction in sell volume caused several securities to trade in the auction at prices significantly higher than the previous day’s close, which in turn inflated opening prices and ETF values.
Was UBS the broker involved in the suspicious orders on the ASX?
ASIC did not publicly name the broker, but its update said the questionable orders were placed through the same broker—believed to be UBS on behalf of an overseas client. UBS declined to comment at this stage.
What actions did ASIC take after the ASX trading spike?
ASIC released an update on its inquiry, interviewed the market participant and the client involved the day after the incident, and gathered information from the ASX and the market participant. The regulator has ruled out HFT and a faulty algorithm as causes but is continuing to investigate and has not dismissed the possibility of market manipulation.
How did the mystery trades affect ANZ’s share price on that day?
The mystery trades pushed ANZ’s share price up by $1.67, or about 6.5%, when trading began at 10am — lifting it to $27.63 at the opening bell — before the stock fell back to $25.79 by the market close.
What should everyday investors know about market integrity after the ASX spike?
The incident raised questions about the integrity of trading on the ASX because opening auction distortions affected blue‑chip prices and ASX 200 ETFs. ASIC is actively investigating, has ruled out some technical causes, and will provide updates as its inquiry continues. Everyday investors should follow regulator announcements and market notices for verified information rather than relying on intraday price movements alone.