Appeal could delay Lehman millions return
The liquidators, PPB Advisory, want to appeal some of the findings by Justice Steven Rares of the NSW Federal Court on a class action brought by Wingecarribee Shire Council, Parkes Shire Council and the City of Swan.
Justice Rares found that the Australian arm of Lehman Brothers, previously called Grange Securities, was liable for the misleading of investors in breach of its fiduciary duties. His final judgment is due in March and is expected to outline how much investors should receive from liquidators.
PPB was also putting together a scheme of arrangement that could settle the liquidation faster than the legal action, PPB's chairman, Stephen Parbery, said. Such an arrangement would require court and regulator approval, and approval by all creditors.
"What would normally happen in a liquidation is that creditors of any type would submit their application. What is difficult about this case is that it is uncharted waters. It is uncharted claims," Mr Parbery said.
"If the appeal is not allowed, the liquidation will just proceed based on the findings of the judge. But with the proviso that a scheme of agreement will still be proposed."
The fresh appeal centres around whether any other parties contributed to the negligence that saw dozens of councils and charities invest in what turned out to be toxic assets.
However, if the court accepts the appeal it could delay disbursements by one to two years, according to John Walker, executive director of IMF, which funded the class action
"If there is not a scheme of arrangement that is agreed to by creditors in the meantime, this will cause greater delays and cost to the administration [process]."
The court was not likely to decide whether to hear the appeal until after Justice Rares delivers his final decision in March, Mr Walker said.
The September ruling found in favour of a 72-member class action and opened way for PPB to return about $200 million to councils, charities and church groups that purchased synthetic collateralised debt obligations, or SCDOs, from Lehman Brothers Australia.
Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…
Liquidators PPB Advisory have filed an application to appeal parts of Justice Steven Rares' Federal Court findings in a class action brought by Wingecarribee Shire Council, Parkes Shire Council and the City of Swan. The appeal challenges some rulings that found Lehman Brothers Australia (formerly Grange Securities) liable for misleading investors and breaching fiduciary duties.
Yes. The September ruling opened the way for PPB to return about $200 million to councils, charities and church groups that bought synthetic collateralised debt obligations (SCDOs), but if the appeal is accepted it could delay disbursements by one to two years, according to John Walker of IMF, which funded the class action.
The funds are intended for a 72-member class made up mainly of councils, charities and church groups that purchased synthetic collateralised debt obligations (SCDOs) from Lehman Brothers Australia. The class action was brought by Wingecarribee Shire Council, Parkes Shire Council and the City of Swan.
Justice Steven Rares’ final judgment is due in March and is expected to outline how much investors should receive from the liquidators based on his findings.
PPB said it was preparing a scheme of arrangement that could settle the liquidation faster than ongoing legal action. Such a scheme would need court and regulator approval and the agreement of all creditors to proceed.
The fresh appeal focuses on whether any other parties contributed to the negligence that led dozens of councils and charities to invest in what turned out to be toxic assets. That question could affect liability and payouts.
If the appeal is not allowed, the liquidation would proceed based on Justice Rares’ findings. PPB also indicated it would continue to propose a scheme of arrangement even if the appeal is rejected.
John Walker of IMF warned that if there is no agreed scheme of arrangement while the appeal is considered, the appeal process could cause greater delays and additional costs to the liquidation administration.

