InvestSMART

ANZ stares down criticism of $10m Smith pay deal

ANZ chairman John Morschel has been forced to fend off shareholder criticism of the $10.1 million pay packet granted to chief executive Mike Smith, saying the bank risks losing Mr Smith if it cannot offer him competitive pay.
By · 20 Dec 2012
By ·
20 Dec 2012
comments Comments
ANZ chairman John Morschel has been forced to fend off shareholder criticism of the $10.1 million pay packet granted to chief executive Mike Smith, saying the bank risks losing Mr Smith if it cannot offer him competitive pay.

Mr Smith, the country's highest-paid banker, became the latest boss to face shareholder dissent over chief executive pay at the bank's annual meeting in Perth on Wednesday.

While 95 per cent of shareholders voted in favour of the remuneration report and a move to grant Mr Smith another $3.2 million in performance rights, the Australian Shareholders' Association and several investors at the meeting branded the pay deal excessive.

In response to the complaints about Mr Smith's package — worth about $26,000 a day — Mr Morschel conceded it was "a lot of money".

However, he said it was "perfectly reasonable" when compared with the pay of executives who ran similar-sized banks overseas, citing ANZ's market capitalisation of $70 billion and its $5.7 billion in annual profits.

Mr Morschel credited Mr Smith with leading the bank's push into high-growth Asian economies.

"The growth and performance over Mr Smith's reign has been excellent," he said. "He saw us through the global financial crisis and he is now taking us through the journey of becoming a super-regional bank.

"I understand shareholders' concern that it is a lot of money.

"But it is what global banking senior executives are being paid today, and the last thing we want to do is, quite frankly, risk losing Mr Smith to an overseas competitor."

Mr Smith was this year approached to run troubled British bank Barclays but later said he had not been interested in the job because it would involve entering "political hot water".

"They couldn't pay you enough to do that," he said in September.

After one person at the meeting suggested ANZ be prepared to let Mr Smith go to another bank, Mr Morschel replied: "I suggest that you have the opportunity to let go . . . by selling your shares."

When previously issued share incentives are taken into account, Mr Smith will receive almost $20 million in remuneration this year.

The debate comes as generous pay packets in banking face growing scrutiny, with National Australia Bank chief executive Cameron Clyne last week facing a 21 per cent protest vote on pay after the bank's profits fell sharply in the previous year.

Bank profit growth is slowing due to weaker demand for credit and higher costs. ANZ on Wednesday said the outlook would remain challenging, with industries in the economy's slow lanes unlikely to fill the gap left after the looming peak in resources investment.

In particular, Mr Smith said trade-exposed industries such as tourism and retail would face a "difficult adjustment" over coming years.

"There are enormous opportunities given Australia's growing linkages to Asia but, at the same time, we have an economy in transition as a result of a strong dollar and weak business and consumer confidence," Mr Smith said.
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

ANZ chief executive Mike Smith was given a reported $10.1 million pay packet that drew criticism. The board also moved to grant him about $3.2 million in performance rights, and when previously issued share incentives are included his total remuneration for the year will be almost $20 million.

Despite vocal criticism from the Australian Shareholders' Association and some investors, around 95% of shareholders voted in favour of ANZ's remuneration report and the proposal to grant Mike Smith the additional $3.2 million in performance rights.

Chairman John Morschel acknowledged the package was 'a lot of money' but said it was 'perfectly reasonable' compared with pay for executives running similar-sized banks overseas. He pointed to ANZ's market capitalisation of about $70 billion, annual profits of $5.7 billion, and credited Smith with successfully steering ANZ through the global financial crisis and growth into high‑growth Asian markets.

Yes. The article notes growing scrutiny of generous banking pay packets. For example, National Australia Bank chief executive Cameron Clyne recently faced a 21% protest vote on pay after the bank's profits fell sharply the previous year.

Yes. The article says Mike Smith was approached this year to run troubled British bank Barclays, but he later said he was not interested because it would involve entering 'political hot water' and that 'they couldn't pay you enough to do that.'

ANZ's chairman used the bank's scale and earnings to justify competitive pay, citing a $70 billion market capitalisation and $5.7 billion in annual profits. At the same time ANZ acknowledged that bank profit growth is slowing and the outlook remains challenging, which has sharpened investor focus on remuneration.

ANZ said profit growth is slowing because of weaker demand for credit and higher costs, and that industries in the 'slow lanes' of the economy are unlikely to fill the gap left after the peak in resources investment. In particular, trade‑exposed industries like tourism and retail were expected to face a 'difficult adjustment.'

Mike Smith emphasised the 'enormous opportunities' from Australia's growing links to Asia and credited his leadership with pushing ANZ into high‑growth Asian economies, positioning the bank on a path toward becoming a 'super‑regional' bank.