InvestSMART

PM to unveil user-pays changes to aged care

THE older and well-off will be expected to pay more towards their aged care under user-pays reforms to be unveiled by the Prime Minister tomorrow.
By · 19 Apr 2012
By ·
19 Apr 2012
comments Comments
THE older and well-off will be expected to pay more towards their aged care under user-pays reforms to be unveiled by the Prime Minister tomorrow.

While the government will not force older people to sell their homes, it is believed that it intends to expand the aged-care means test.

It is believed the government's response to a Productivity Commission's report into the aged-care sector also has a focus on improving care at home and in retirement villages to reduce reliance on nursing homes.

This reflects taxpayer-funded research released by the Council of the Ageing just before Easter showing widespread concern about residential care and a strong preference for living independently at home, albeit with occasional help with domestic chores.

Some of the money for in-home care will come from reducing subsidies for nursing homes. Expanding means-testing for aged care will be the most controversial of the issues to be unveiled tomorrow by Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Health and Ageing Minister Mark Butler. Ms Gillard postponed a $5500-a-head fund-raiser dinner scheduled for tonight at Woodside Energy's Perth headquarters so she could rush back to Canberra for the announcement.

In its Caring for Older Australians report, released in August last year, the Productivity Commission recommended aged care shift from a rationed system to one that is both means and needs-tested.

It said those going into aged care could pay by using equity in their home, either through a reverse mortgage or through a home credit scheme.

Effectively like a loan, it would be repaid when the home was sold after the person died, unless their spouse or a disabled child was still living there.

The commission's proposed means test including the family home would determine how much people could afford for care and accommodation.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

The reforms will expect older and relatively well-off people to pay more for aged care by expanding the aged-care means test. The package also focuses on improving care at home and in retirement villages to reduce reliance on nursing homes, with some in-home care funding coming from reduced subsidies for residential nursing homes. The changes are being unveiled by Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Health and Ageing Minister Mark Butler.

No — the government says it will not force older people to sell their homes. However, the proposals are likely to expand the means test to include the family home, and people could be encouraged to use home equity (for example via a reverse mortgage or a home credit scheme) to pay for care. Such loans would typically be repaid when the home is sold after the person dies, unless a spouse or a disabled child still lives there.

According to the article, some of the money for boosted in-home care will come from reducing subsidies for nursing homes. The package shifts funding emphasis toward in-home and retirement-village care while trimming support for residential care.

The Productivity Commission recommended moving aged care from a rationed system to one that is both means-tested and needs-tested. It suggested including the family home in the means test and allowing people to use home equity — for example through a reverse mortgage or home credit scheme — to help pay for care and accommodation.

Taxpayer-funded research from the Council on the Ageing found widespread concern about residential care and a strong preference among older people to live independently at home, with occasional help for domestic chores rather than moving into nursing homes.

Expanding the aged-care means test — especially if it includes the family home — is politically sensitive because it means the older and better-off would be expected to pay more for care. The article notes the means-test expansion will be the most controversial part of the package and that the announcement was important enough for the Prime Minister to delay a high-value fundraising event to return to Canberra for it.

The government is shifting focus toward in-home care and retirement villages to reduce reliance on nursing homes, and it plans to reduce some nursing-home subsidies to fund in-home services. That could change demand dynamics between residential aged-care providers and in-home or retirement-village services, although the article does not provide detailed financial impacts.

The announcement is being unveiled by Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Health and Ageing Minister Mark Butler. The article mentions Ms Gillard postponed a $5,500-a-head fundraiser dinner at Woodside Energy's Perth headquarters so she could rush back to Canberra for the announcement.