InvestSMART

Farewell the Chief to save PNG from chaos

Michael Somare is not Robert Mugabe, though he's been around as long. He doesn't send North Korean-trained battalions to attack political rivals, or sequester the best foreign-owned plantations to parcel out to cronies. He submits to votes of no-confidence in Parliament, and goes to elections every five years, inviting in journalists like me to watch.
By · 17 Dec 2011
By ·
17 Dec 2011
comments Comments
Michael Somare is not Robert Mugabe, though he's been around as long. He doesn't send North Korean-trained battalions to attack political rivals, or sequester the best foreign-owned plantations to parcel out to cronies. He submits to votes of no-confidence in Parliament, and goes to elections every five years, inviting in journalists like me to watch.

Michael Somare is not Robert Mugabe, though he's been around as long. He doesn't send North Korean-trained battalions to attack political rivals, or sequester the best foreign-owned plantations to parcel out to cronies. He submits to votes of no-confidence in Parliament, and goes to elections every five years, inviting in journalists like me to watch.

Nor is Papua New Guinea a Zimbabwe. Its economy is robust, with growth heading up towards double digits. It has almost a year's import bills in foreign reserves. It's been stable enough for ExxonMobil and its partners to put $US15.7 billion into a liquefied natural gas project coming on stream in 2014. So it's not a failed state.

Yet after a political career stretching longer than the 36 years since Papua New Guinea became independent, neither Somare nor the state connect much with the country's nearly 7 million people. He and his political coterie are barriers between them and the state's wealth. For this reason, it would be best if this week's crisis ends with his retirement.

Although Somare got his first schooling in Japanese under the wartime occupation of the New Guinea coast, he's very much a creation of us. He went to a high school we ran, taught in primary schools we set up, became a broadcaster in the local ABC network, began his political career in the legislature we set up.

Like many of his political colleagues, he liked a beer, a bet on the horses through an SP bookie, and follows the rugby league. With the help of Bob Hawke at the ACTU, he got local public servant wages up to those of the expats, a heavy burden of expectations. He and the political class slid easily into the assumption that people running the new country should live well, just like the old colonials.

As a result, more and more of national revenues from big enclave mining projects like Ok Tedi, Porgera and Lihir went on the comforts and perks of the political class. The foundations of a broad economy left by the departing administration - the highway from Lae up to the highlands and feeder roads out to the coffee growers, the rural extension services and co-ops, the police service, the primary schools and health clinics, the telecom and aviation systems - fell into decay.

Somare was not solely to blame, nor the worst leader. The country reached its nadir in the late 1990s under the populist semi-gangster Bill Skate. After returning to power for the third time in 2002, Somare, known as the Chief, preserved some of the fiscal reforms made by his predecessor, Mekere Morauta.

But he's been a prime minister happy to surrender the power of the state to vested interests. Somare has long had a contentious relationship with the timber industry, with studies suggesting that 70 per cent of logging is illegal and transfer pricing is rife.

The biggest power in PNG forestry is the logging and palm oil group Rimbunan Hijau, owned by the reclusive Malaysian timber baron Tiong Hiew King, based in the Sarawak river town of Sibu. As well as accounting for half the PNG timber industry through various subsidiaries, it owns one of PNG's two daily newspapers and its main investment bank.

The forestry officials and police supposed to supervise its activities have to travel in company transport for their inspections, and send their children to schools set up by the company.

Now the loggers have been joined by the Chinese: the state metal company that took over the Ramu nickel project, pushing aside labour, land-owner and environmental inspectors the illegal migrants from Fujian grabbing the small enterprise sector and sparking riots in Lae, Popondetta and other towns. A resourceless administration, a complaisant prime minister look on.

The ExxonMobil project is run to scrupulous standards, and it alone will boost PNG's gross domestic product by 25 per cent. The contribution of mining and petroleum to total government revenue could jump from the present 21 per cent to more than 50 per cent by 2018, the Australian National University's John Conroy, an economist, says.

Ordinary people have long been waiting for some of this revenue. In the three months since the then ailing Somare was unceremoniously ousted from Parliament, Peter O'Neill's government began the process with a supplementary budget that put more into development - lower school fees, the health system and police accommodation and vehicles.

His ministers have also further exposed many serious financial abuses under Somare, including irregular loans from public enterprises, suspicious sales from the share portfolio of the national pension scheme, and the diversion of public funds to private enterprises. Somare's son, the ousted (or perhaps restored) public enterprises minister Arthur Somare and a former finance minister, Patrick Pruaitch, a relative by marriage, figure in many of these.

With only six months of the parliamentary term to run, some might wonder what the struggle is all about. It's about what Paul Barker, the head of Port Moresby's Institute of National Affairs, calls the "honeypot" of public funds. Incumbents can easily divert spending intended for, say, a school building, to local power brokers. By the time audits catch up, the election is long past. The discretionary district grants put at the disposal of each MP can be disbursed early to supporters, held back from opponents.

As citizens watch nervously the contest between rival sets of prime minister, governor-general and police chief, church leaders and other senior figures have been trying to broker a compromise, and split O'Neill and Somare from their more hot-headed supporters.

Maybe a mutually acceptable caretaker leader can be found, with strict controls over spending, as the election commission gets on with the difficult job of updating the electoral rolls across the far-flung villages: a face-saving, "Melanesian solution" that pulls PNG out of the deadlock of lawyers, police and perhaps worse resorts. Somare's friends such as Bob Hawke could help by urging him to take a dignified retirement if one is offered.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

The article says ExxonMobil and partners invested about US$15.7 billion in a liquefied natural gas project that was due to come on stream in 2014. That project is run to scrupulous standards and, on its own, is expected to boost PNG’s GDP by around 25%, making the energy sector a major driver of growth and a focal point for investors watching PNG’s resource economy.

According to the article, mining and petroleum currently account for roughly 21% of government revenue, but an economist cited (John Conroy) expects that share could rise to more than 50% by 2018 as big projects come online. For investors, that implies increasing government dependence on resource revenues and potential policy shifts tied to those sectors.

Yes. The article describes a high-profile political standoff involving Michael Somare and Peter O’Neill, and notes that fights over control of the ‘honeypot’ of public funds can lead to discretionary spending abuses. Political deadlock or abrupt leadership changes can affect budgets, project approvals and the pace of reforms—factors everyday investors should monitor.

The article highlights several governance concerns: alleged diversion of public funds, irregular loans from public enterprises, suspicious sales from the national pension scheme’s share portfolio, and misuse of discretionary district grants by incumbents. Studies also suggest up to 70% of logging may be illegal and transfer pricing is common in forestry—issues that create regulatory, reputational and operational risk for investors.

The article identifies Rimbunan Hijau as the dominant forestry and palm‑oil group in PNG, reportedly accounting for about half the timber industry through subsidiaries and owning a daily newspaper and a main investment bank. The close ties between large timber companies, local officials and communities—plus allegations of illegal logging and transfer pricing—make the forestry sector a politically sensitive area that can affect investor sentiment and policy action.

The article reports that after Michael Somare was ousted, Peter O’Neill’s government introduced a supplementary budget that reallocated more funds to development priorities such as lower school fees, health services, and police accommodation and vehicles. His ministers also exposed financial abuses from the previous administration, signaling an attempt to redirect public spending toward visible public services.

Yes. The article documents growing influence from Malaysian and Chinese-linked interests: Rimbunan Hijau (Malaysian-owned) is a major timber and investment player, and a state metal company and migrant workers from Fujian have been linked to tensions around the Ramu nickel project and small enterprise competition. These foreign actors affect market dynamics, labor and community relations, and can contribute to social unrest—important considerations for investors.

Based on the article, investors should watch: the resolution of the leadership standoff (including any caretaker arrangements), auditing and disclosure of public finances, implementation of budget reallocations toward development, progress of major resource projects like the LNG and Ramu nickel operations, and signs of reform or clampdowns in forestry and public‑enterprise governance. These developments will influence the country’s investment climate and sovereign revenue outlook.