InvestSMART

Enough of sitting around, it's time to put money to work

It's 1623, Tulip mania. A single tulip bulb sells for a thousand Dutch florins, seven times the average annual wage. The average tulip trader makes 60,000 florins a month - 400 times the annual wage.
By · 17 Mar 2012
By ·
17 Mar 2012
comments Comments
It's 1623, Tulip mania. A single tulip bulb sells for a thousand Dutch florins, seven times the average annual wage. The average tulip trader makes 60,000 florins a month - 400 times the annual wage.

Forty bulbs sell for 100,000 florins. You could have bought 3333 pigs for the same price. People were selling possessions to speculate in the tulip market.

Some tulip traders started selling tulips that had just been planted. Others sold bulbs they intended to plant. Gotta love those futures traders. They called it "wind trade" at the time because that's all the tangible assets you had: thin air.

There has been a lot written about bubbles, and how to spot them. Here are the lessons from 400 years ago. How to spot a bubble:

Everybody is making gains.

People believe the passion for stocks will last forever.

Your ordinary industry is neglected.

Tangible assets are converted to cash to speculate in shares. (Equity mate).

Other asset classes are deserted.

Luxuries of every sort rise in price.

Assets are bought to sell, not bought for their return.

Now let's turn this on its head and see whether we aren't in the opposite of a bubble, a period in the sharemarket when everyone is undervaluing everything, a sharemarket "bust" maybe. Let's see whether we're being too bearish. If so, the following should be happening:

Nobody is making money. Tick.

People believe long-term investment is over forever. Tick.

Everybody is concentrating on keeping their jobs. Tick.

Everyone is trying to pay down debts. Tick.

Other asset classes are swamped (term deposits). Tick.

Luxury items of every sort fall in price (discretionary retailing in a hole). Tick.

Assets are bought for their return, not to sell (income stocks favoured). Tick.

All a bit simple, but there are other factors that suggest we are closer to a bottom than a top. For instance:

There is a lot of cash ready to invest.

The yield gap favours equities over bonds. Yields are historically high. Gross equity yields average 7 per cent against the 10-year bond yield at 4.16 per cent.

Equities are historically cheap at a price-earnings ratio of 10.5 times earnings. The long-term average is 37 per cent higher at 14.4 times earnings with peaks of 20 times.

Balance sheets are historically strong.

So what is holding us back? The answer isn't "price" the price is right. The answer is "risk".

We have spent the past 4? years getting a salutary lesson in risk and its consequences. We are fed up with losing money, basically.

But even with the 82 per cent fall in the Japanese sharemarket in the past 22 years, there have been seven bull markets averaging 58 per cent, each lasting an average of one year and four months. Periods when the risk aversion eased enough for the herd to go back in. It can happen and when it comes to price, the stage is set.

For equities to rally, we just need a catalyst, anything that turns the focus away from fear and risk to greed, or, more likely, the need for a return. It could be a bit of blue sky on Europe after the Greek deal. It could be the pitiful returns and overpricing of fixed-interest instruments and other safe havens, such as gold (zero return) and the mattress (zero return).

But more likely it is going to be the cash simply busting out of its seams.

Consumer, investor and corporate balance sheets are all being rebuilt.

The process may not be complete, but there is a lot of money ready to go. JPMorgan has just announced a $15 billion share buyback and an increased dividend. It has had enough of sitting around and has decided to put its money to work.

A waterfall starts with one drop. Was that it?

Marcus Padley is a stockbroker with Patersons Securities and the author of stockmarket newsletter Marcus Today. His views do not necessarily reflect the views of Patersons.

Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

The article outlines classic bubble signs: everyone is suddenly making gains, people assume the boom will last forever, ordinary industries are neglected, tangible assets are sold to speculate in shares, other asset classes are deserted, luxury items surge in price, and assets are bought to flip rather than for their income or return. Those are the types of red flags investors should watch for.

According to the article, equities appear historically cheap with a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio around 10.5 times earnings versus a long-term average of 14.4 times (about 37% higher) and historical peaks near 20 times. Price-to-earnings is a useful, commonly cited metric for comparing current valuations with long-term norms.

The yield gap compares gross equity yields to bond yields. The article states gross equity yields average about 7% while the 10-year bond yield is around 4.16%, which means equities are currently offering higher yields relative to bonds — a factor that can make shares more attractive to income-seeking investors.

The article points out several indicators of a potential bottom: nobody is making money right now, many believe long-term investing is over, people focus on job security and paying down debt, term deposits and other safer assets are crowded, luxury retailers are struggling, income stocks are favoured, corporate and consumer balance sheets are being rebuilt, and there is a lot of cash ready to invest. Together these suggest sentiment is very cautious and valuations may already be attractive.

The article emphasizes 'risk' as the main barrier. Recent years have taught investors a hard lesson about losing money, increasing risk aversion. Even with attractive prices and yields, fear of further losses keeps many on the sidelines until sentiment improves.

The article uses JPMorgan's $15 billion share buyback and higher dividend as an example of a large company deciding to 'put its money to work.' Such moves can act as catalysts, encouraging confidence and potentially starting a wider flow of cash back into equities — though a rally usually needs broader shifts in sentiment as well.

Possible catalysts mentioned include positive developments in Europe (for example progress after a Greek deal), the unattractive returns on fixed-income instruments and safe havens like gold or cash, and simply cash on the sidelines starting to flow into equities as risk aversion eases. The article suggests the build-up of cash and repaired balance sheets could make a rally more likely once sentiment changes.

The article cites the Japanese sharemarket: despite an 82% fall over 22 years, there were seven separate bull markets averaging 58% gains and lasting about one year and four months each. That example illustrates how risk appetite can return and produce significant rallies even after extended downturns.