Australia’s biggest salary packaging company, McMillan Shakespeare, says it will not know until next year the extent of the effect of the former government’s attempt to tighten the rules on tax benefits for salary-sacrificed cars.
But the one-time market darling has suggested that regulatory risk will not be a problem in the near term, after securing support for its plight from the Coalition, and says that demand for novated leases is inching back to levels seen a year ago.
McMillan Shakespeare provides salary packaging and vehicle leasing administration services, and its clients include every government in Australia. It has about half the country’s outsourced remuneration services market.
Its shares have made up about half the ground lost in July when Labor announced plans to end the favoured tax treatment of company cars, a tax break estimated by Treasury to cost $800 million a year. McMillan Shakespeare said at its annual meeting in Melbourne that announcement led to ‘‘sleepless nights’’ and took the industry ‘‘completely by surprise’’.
In 2010, it said the purchase of an asset management business was a ‘‘desirable diversification from fringe benefits tax risk’’.
Declining to give full-year guidance on Tuesday, McMillan Shakespeare said Labor’s proposal had hit its business during the September quarter and it would not return to ‘‘business as usual’’ until the 2014 calendar year.
It also announced an 18¢ dividend and the purchase of CLM Fleet Management in Britain for £8.5 million ($14.2 million).
Asked whether McMillan Shakespeare was tweaking its business model to reduce risk against regulatory change, chairman Ronald Pitcher said: ‘‘We’re diversifying, but within the ... finance industry.
‘‘But remember, we’ve got a very good business. We are not going to walk away from the core business ... it’s very good to us. So why would we? We think what we went through in that period, and the undertakings that come out of that, that we have a good future to look forward to.’’
Chief executive Michael Kay said the CLM purchase was driven in part by a desire to diversify, and there had been a silver lining to the political fight. ‘‘This perceived regulatory risk is a fantastic barrier to entry in our market. So it’s not a bad market to be in, because a lot of people go in and go, ‘I can’t get my head around this,’’’ he said.